Guillot v. Ferrell et al

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT REJECTED; The Defendant United States Postal Service is ORDERED to file its response to the Complaint in this action on or before August 25, 2017, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/15/2017. (Lafata, M)

1 PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
2 BOBBIE J. MONTOYA
Assistant United States Attorney
3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, California 95814
4 Telephone: [phone]
5 Attorneys for Defendant
United States Postal Service
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

FRANK GUILLOT,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14

Case No. 1:16-CV-01307-AWI-MJS

v.
TERRENCE FERRELL, THE UNITED
STATES POSTAL SERVICE, AND DOES 120, INCLUSIVE,
Defendants.

15

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT UNITED STATES POSTAL
SERVICE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
AND
ORDER THEREON
(AUGUST 25, 2017 DEADLINE)

16
17

Plaintiff Frank Guillot and defendant United States Postal Service (USPS), by and through their

18 undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate, subject to the court’s approval, that defendant USPS
19 shall have a thirty-day extension of time, to September 13, 2017, to respond to the plaintiff’s complaint.
20

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

21 DATED: August 15, 2017

PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney

22
23

/s/ Bobbie J. Montoya

24

BOBBIE J. MONTOYA
Assistant United States Attorney

25

Attorneys for Defendant
United States Postal Service

26
27
28
Stipulation and Order for Extension of Time for Defendant
USPS to Respond to Complaint

30

1

1
2 DATED: August 15, 2017

THE FOLLAND LAW GROUP

3
/s/ Brian N. Folland

4

(auth. 8/14/17)

BRIAN N. FOLLAND

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff Frank Guillot

6
7
8

ORDER

9
10
11

The Court REJECTS the parties’ STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR

12 DEFENDANT UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT IN Case
13 No. 1:16-CV-01307-AWI-MJS because no justification whatsoever, much less good cause,
14 was provided in support of the requested relief and the said request for relief come only ten
15
16

days after a Scheduling Conference and Order in which the Defendant in this already longdelayed case advised it would, and it was ordered to, file its responsive pleading on or before

17
August 14, 2017.
18
19
20

The Defendant United States Postal Service is ORDERED to file its response to the
Complaint in this action on or before August 25, 2017.

21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 15, 2017

24

/s/

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order for Extension of Time for Defendant
USPS to Respond to Complaint

30

Michael J. Seng

2