Solorio et al vs. Clovis Unified School District

Filing 18

PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF S. SIMMONS; AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on April 17, 2017. (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 Sloan R. Simmons, SBN 233752 Kristy Boyes SBN 303975 2 LOZANO SMITH One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 3 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 329-7433 4 Facsimile: (916) 329-9050 5 Attorneys for District CLOVIS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOZANO SMITH One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel 916-329-7433 Fax 916-329-9050 10 11 J.S., a minor, by and with her parents, ALBERTO SOLORIO and ALICIA SOLORIO, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 CLOVIS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 15 District. 16 Case No. 1:16-cv-01319-LJO-BAM PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND SUPPORTING DECLARATION OF S. SIMMONS; AND ORDER Hearing Date: June 8, 2017 Time: 8:30 a.m. Courtroom: 4 (LJO) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Stip. Re: Extension of Briefing Schedule & Supp. Decl.; J.S. et al. v. CUSD & Order Case No. 1:16-cv-01319-LJO-BAM 1 TO THE HONORABLE COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Local Rules 143 2 and 144, by and between PLAINTIFF J.S. (“Plaintiff”), through her counsel of record, and 3 DEFENDANT Clovis Unified School District (“District,” and referred to with Plaintiffs as, “Parties”), 4 through its counsel of record, as follows: 5 1. Consistent with the dates and scheduled proposed by the Parties, on December 16, 2016, the Court issued its Scheduling Conference Order in this matter, setting the following briefing and 7 hearing schedule: (1) Plaintiff’s Opening Brief due March 16, 2017; (2) the District’s Opposition Brief 8 due April 18, 2017; (3) the Plaintiff’s Reply Brief due May 4, 2017; and (4) the hearing on the briefing 9 LOZANO SMITH 4 Lower Ragsdale Drive, Suite 200 Monterey, CA 93940-5758 Tel 831-646-1501 Fax 831-646-1801 6 for June 8, 2017. 10 2. 11 Plaintiff’s Opening Brief was filed on March 20, 2017, four (4) days beyond the March 16, 2017 briefing deadline for same in the Court’s Scheduling Conference Order. 12 3. On March 20, 2017, the District’s counsel requested via email, confirmation from 13 Plaintiff’s counsel that she would be agreeable to a short extension of the District’s April 18, 2017 14 Opposition Brief deadline, in light of the delay in Plaintiffs’ filing of the Opening Brief, if the District’s 15 counsel determined that additional time was necessary. Plaintiffs’ counsel confirmed agreement to this 16 proposition. 17 18 4. extension of additional time is necessary to complete the District’s Opposition Brief for filing. 19 20 As of today’s date, April 14, 2017, the District’s counsel determined that a short 5. The Parties agree that based upon the foregoing, the deadline for District’s Opposition Brief should be extended three (3) days, to April 21, 2017. 21 6. There has been no previous modification or requests for modification to the proposed 22 briefing and hearing schedule in this matter. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 Stip. Re: Extension of Briefing Schedule & Supp. Decl.; & Order -2- J.S. et al. v. CUSD Case No. 1:16-cv-01319-LJO-BAM 1 7. Accordingly, the Parties request approval by the Court this agreed-upon modification to 2 the briefing schedule. 3 Dated: April 14, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 4 STUDENT RIGHTS ATTORNEYS 5 /s/ Deborah L. Pepaj*_____________________ DEBORAH L. PEPAJ Attorney for Plaintiffs J.S., a minor, by and with her parents, ALBERTO SOLORIO and ALICIA SOLORIO 6 7 8 LOZANO SMITH 4 Lower Ragsdale Drive, Suite 200 Monterey, CA 93940-5758 Tel 831-646-1501 Fax 831-646-1801 9 10 11 12 13 14 Dated: April 14, 2017 Respectfully submitted, LOZANO SMITH /s/ Sloan R. Simmons SLOAN R. SIMMONS KRISTY BOYES Attorneys for Defendant CLOVIS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT *Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories thereto has been obtained. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. Re: Extension of Briefing Schedule & Supp. Decl.; & Order -3- J.S. et al. v. CUSD Case No. 1:16-cv-01319-LJO-BAM 1 DECLARATION OF SLOAN SIMMONS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION 2 I, SLOAN R. SIMMONS, declare as follows: 3 1. I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all courts in the State of 4 California, as well as before this and other courts, am a partner with the law firm of Lozano Smith, 5 counsel of record for Defendant Clovis Unified School District (“District”), and one of the attorneys 6 primarily responsible for handling this matter on behalf of the District. I have personal knowledge of 7 the matters contained within this Declaration and, if I am called upon to testify as to the truth of the 8 statements made herein, I could and would competently testify hereto. LOZANO SMITH 4 Lower Ragsdale Drive, Suite 200 Monterey, CA 93940-5758 Tel 831-646-1501 Fax 831-646-1801 9 10 2. This Declaration is submitted pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Conference Order, section 5, and in support of the foregoing Joint Stipulation Re: Extension of Briefing Schedule. 11 3. Consistent with the dates and scheduled proposed by the Parties, on December 16, 2016, 12 the Court issued its Scheduling Conference Order in this matter, setting the following briefing and 13 hearing schedule: (1) Plaintiff’s Opening Brief due March 16, 2017; (2) the District’s Opposition Brief 14 due April 18, 2017; (3) the Plaintiff’s Reply Brief due May 4, 2017; and (4) the hearing on the briefing 15 for June 8, 2017. 16 4. Plaintiff’s Opening Brief was filed on March 20, 2017, four (4) days beyond the March 17 16, 2017 briefing deadline for same in the Court’s Scheduling Conference Order. See ECF Docket No. 18 16. 19 5. On March 20, 2017, the District’s counsel requested via email, confirmation from 20 Plaintiff’s counsel that she would be agreeable to a short extension of the District’s April 18, 2017 21 Opposition Brief deadline, in light of the delay in Plaintiffs’ filing of the Opening Brief, if the District’s 22 counsel determined that additional time was necessary. Plaintiffs’ counsel confirmed agreement to this 23 proposition. A true and correct copy of said email is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated by 24 reference. 25 6. As of today’s date, April 14, 2017, the District’s counsel determined that a short 26 extension of additional time is necessary to complete the District’s Opposition Brief for filing. The 27 /// 28 Stip. Re: Extension of Briefing Schedule & Supp. Decl.; & Order -4- J.S. et al. v. CUSD Case No. 1:16-cv-01319-LJO-BAM 1 Parties met and conferred on this issue via email, and agreed that the deadline for District’s Opposition 2 Brief should be extended three (3) days, to April 21, 2017. 3 4 5 6 7. There has been no previous modification or requests for modification to the proposed briefing and hearing schedule in this matter. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this Declaration was executed on April 14, 2017, at Sacramento, California. 7 8 LOZANO SMITH 4 Lower Ragsdale Drive, Suite 200 Monterey, CA 93940-5758 Tel 831-646-1501 Fax 831-646-1801 9 SLOAN R. SIMMONS 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. Re: Extension of Briefing Schedule & Supp. Decl.; & Order -5- J.S. et al. v. CUSD Case No. 1:16-cv-01319-LJO-BAM ORDER 1 2 3 Based upon the foregoing Stipulation between the Parties, and the supporting declaration of Sloan R. Simmons, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE: 4 5 The Court hereby orders the deadline for the District’s Opposition Brief is extended to April 21, 2017. 6 7 8 LOZANO SMITH 4 Lower Ragsdale Drive, Suite 200 Monterey, CA 93940-5758 Tel 831-646-1501 Fax 831-646-1801 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ April 17, 2017 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. Re: Extension of Briefing Schedule & Supp. Decl.; & Order -6- J.S. et al. v. CUSD Case No. 1:16-cv-01319-LJO-BAM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?