Soest v. Mojave Air and Space Port, et al.
Filing
10
ORDER GRANTING 6 STAY, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/20/2016. CASE STAYED. All pending dates, hearings and conferences are VACATED. Joint status report due by 5/19/2017. (Hall, S)
Michael J. Terhar [SBN: 89491]
1 Kathy A. Schmeckpeper [SBN: 217110]
Jonathan E. Hembree [SBN: 274051]
2 CUNNINGHAM SWAIM, LLP
2 North Lake Avenue, Suite 550
3 Pasadena, California 91101
Telephone: (626) 765-3000
4 Facsimile: (626) 765-3030
E-mail:mterhar@cunnighamswaim.com
5 kschmeckpeper@cunninghamswaim.com
6
jhembree@cunninghamswaim.com
Attorneys for Defendants,
7 MOJAVE AIR AND SPACE PORT, a public entity
(erroneously sued and served as Mojave Air Space
8 Port and East Kern Airport District), STUART
9
WITT, and KEVIN WOJTKIEWICZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12 ERNEST DEAN SOEST;
Case No. 1:16-cv-01334 JLT
13
STIPULATION TO STAY
ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MOJAVE AIR AND SPACE PORT;
)
EAST KERN AIRPORT DISTRICT;
)
STUART WITT; Kevin Wojtkiewicz; and )
DOES 1-100, Inclusive.
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
(Doc. 6)
21
22
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, BY AND BETWEEN ALL PARTIES to this
23
24 action, plaintiff Ernest Dean Soest (“Plaintiff” or “Soest”) and defendants MOJAVE
25 AIR AND SPACE PORT, a public entity (erroneously sued and served as Mojave
26 Air Space Port and East Kern Airport District), STUART WITT, and KEVIN
27 WOJTKIEWICZ (“Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of record, as
28 follows:
STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
102.0345
WHEREAS, in Kern County Superior Court, East Division, Mojave Branch, in
1
2 the matter The People of the State of California vs. Ernest Dean Soest, Case Nos.
3 MF011311 and MF010864, Plaintiff has entered into a Stipulation Regarding
4 Disposition of Property, an F-100, tail #53-1688 (hereafter “F-100”) and the Court
5 has executed an Order dated September 15, 2016 pursuant to that Stipulation
6 (hereafter “F-100 Stipulation and Order”.). A true and correct copy of this F-100
7 Stipulation and Order are attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”
WHEREAS this F-100 Stipulation and Order regarding the “transportation,
8
9 restoration, and placement of the F-100” states, in part, that a hearing to determine
10 the status of the work is set for May 8, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. in Department A of the
11 Kern County Superior Court, Mojave Branch.
WHEREAS Plaintiff, in pro persona, has also brought a civil action in Kern
12
13 County Superior Court, Case No. BCV-15-100851, titled Ernest Dean Soest vs.
14 Mojave Air Space Port, East Kern Airport District, County of Kern, Stuart Witt,
15 Kevin Wojtkiewicz, which is both on appeal in the Fifth Appellate District, Case No.
16 F073496 against Mojave Air Space Port, Stuart Witt, and Kevin Wojkiewicz, and
17 still active against Kern County in trial court, and which contains allegations
18 regarding his work on the F-100 and regarding Case Nos. MF011311 and
19 MF010864.
WHEREAS Plaintiff’s Complaint herein contains allegations regarding his
20
21 work on the F-100 and allegations arising from Case Nos. MF011311 and
22 MF010864.
WHEREAS Counsel for Defendants sent September 30, 2016 correspondence
23
24 to Counsel for Plaintiff to meet and confer regarding the deficiencies of his
25 Complaint in the above-captioned action. (hereafter “Meet and Confer
26 Correspondence.”) A true and correct copy of this September 30, 2016
27 correspondence is attached hereto as Exhibit “B.”
WHEREAS Counsel for both Defendants and Plaintiffs have agreed that in the
28
2
STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
512.0033
1 event the Court does not agree to stay this action, any responsive pleading by
2 Defendants to Plaintiff’s Complaint herein, shall not be due until 15 days after the
3 Court’s denial of this Proposed Order.
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED BY THE PARTIES
4
5 THAT:
1. This action will be stayed, for at least nine months, pending placement of
6
7
the F-100 (consistent with and as set forth in the “F-100 Stipulation and
8
Order”) and the Kern County Superior Court, Mojave Branch’s May 8,
9
2017 hearing to determine the status of the work.
2. That all current deadlines and status conferences in the above-captioned
10
action be vacated and reset following the lifting of the stay in this matter.
11
3. Plaintiff will file and serve a first amended complaint in this action within
12
13
30 days of the F-100 placement to address the issues raised in the Meet and
14
Confer Correspondence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
16 Dated: October 20, 2016
LAW OFFICES OF OLAF LANDSGAARD
17
By:
18
Olaf Landsgaard,
Attorney for Plaintiff,
ERNEST DEAN SOEST
19
20
21
Dated: October 20, 2016
CUNNINGHAM SWAIM, LLP
22
By:
23
Michael J. Terhar
Kathy A. Schmeckpeper
Jonathan E. Hembree
Attorneys for Defendants,
Attorneys for Defendants,
MOJAVE AIR AND SPACE
PORT, a public entity,
STUART WITT, and KEVIN
WOJTKIEWICZ
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
512.0033
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Based upon the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the Court
3 ORDERS:
4
1. This action is STAYED;
5
2. No later than May 19, 2017, counsel SHALL file a joint report detailing the
status of the placement of the F-100;
6
7
3. All case deadlines are STAYED;
8
4. Plaintiff may file a first amended complaint in this action within 30 days of
the F-100 placement, which will address the issues raised in the Meet and
9
Confer Correspondence.
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 20, 2016
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER
512.0033
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?