Soest v. Mojave Air and Space Port, et al.

Filing 10

ORDER GRANTING 6 STAY, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/20/2016. CASE STAYED. All pending dates, hearings and conferences are VACATED. Joint status report due by 5/19/2017. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
Michael J. Terhar [SBN: 89491] 1 Kathy A. Schmeckpeper [SBN: 217110] Jonathan E. Hembree [SBN: 274051] 2 CUNNINGHAM SWAIM, LLP 2 North Lake Avenue, Suite 550 3 Pasadena, California 91101 Telephone: (626) 765-3000 4 Facsimile: (626) 765-3030 E-mail:mterhar@cunnighamswaim.com 5 kschmeckpeper@cunninghamswaim.com 6 jhembree@cunninghamswaim.com Attorneys for Defendants, 7 MOJAVE AIR AND SPACE PORT, a public entity (erroneously sued and served as Mojave Air Space 8 Port and East Kern Airport District), STUART 9 WITT, and KEVIN WOJTKIEWICZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 ERNEST DEAN SOEST; Case No. 1:16-cv-01334 JLT 13 STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MOJAVE AIR AND SPACE PORT; ) EAST KERN AIRPORT DISTRICT; ) STUART WITT; Kevin Wojtkiewicz; and ) DOES 1-100, Inclusive. ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) (Doc. 6) 21 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, BY AND BETWEEN ALL PARTIES to this 23 24 action, plaintiff Ernest Dean Soest (“Plaintiff” or “Soest”) and defendants MOJAVE 25 AIR AND SPACE PORT, a public entity (erroneously sued and served as Mojave 26 Air Space Port and East Kern Airport District), STUART WITT, and KEVIN 27 WOJTKIEWICZ (“Defendants”), by and through their attorneys of record, as 28 follows: STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 102.0345 WHEREAS, in Kern County Superior Court, East Division, Mojave Branch, in 1 2 the matter The People of the State of California vs. Ernest Dean Soest, Case Nos. 3 MF011311 and MF010864, Plaintiff has entered into a Stipulation Regarding 4 Disposition of Property, an F-100, tail #53-1688 (hereafter “F-100”) and the Court 5 has executed an Order dated September 15, 2016 pursuant to that Stipulation 6 (hereafter “F-100 Stipulation and Order”.). A true and correct copy of this F-100 7 Stipulation and Order are attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” WHEREAS this F-100 Stipulation and Order regarding the “transportation, 8 9 restoration, and placement of the F-100” states, in part, that a hearing to determine 10 the status of the work is set for May 8, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. in Department A of the 11 Kern County Superior Court, Mojave Branch. WHEREAS Plaintiff, in pro persona, has also brought a civil action in Kern 12 13 County Superior Court, Case No. BCV-15-100851, titled Ernest Dean Soest vs. 14 Mojave Air Space Port, East Kern Airport District, County of Kern, Stuart Witt, 15 Kevin Wojtkiewicz, which is both on appeal in the Fifth Appellate District, Case No. 16 F073496 against Mojave Air Space Port, Stuart Witt, and Kevin Wojkiewicz, and 17 still active against Kern County in trial court, and which contains allegations 18 regarding his work on the F-100 and regarding Case Nos. MF011311 and 19 MF010864. WHEREAS Plaintiff’s Complaint herein contains allegations regarding his 20 21 work on the F-100 and allegations arising from Case Nos. MF011311 and 22 MF010864. WHEREAS Counsel for Defendants sent September 30, 2016 correspondence 23 24 to Counsel for Plaintiff to meet and confer regarding the deficiencies of his 25 Complaint in the above-captioned action. (hereafter “Meet and Confer 26 Correspondence.”) A true and correct copy of this September 30, 2016 27 correspondence is attached hereto as Exhibit “B.” WHEREAS Counsel for both Defendants and Plaintiffs have agreed that in the 28 2 STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 512.0033 1 event the Court does not agree to stay this action, any responsive pleading by 2 Defendants to Plaintiff’s Complaint herein, shall not be due until 15 days after the 3 Court’s denial of this Proposed Order. IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED BY THE PARTIES 4 5 THAT: 1. This action will be stayed, for at least nine months, pending placement of 6 7 the F-100 (consistent with and as set forth in the “F-100 Stipulation and 8 Order”) and the Kern County Superior Court, Mojave Branch’s May 8, 9 2017 hearing to determine the status of the work. 2. That all current deadlines and status conferences in the above-captioned 10 action be vacated and reset following the lifting of the stay in this matter. 11 3. Plaintiff will file and serve a first amended complaint in this action within 12 13 30 days of the F-100 placement to address the issues raised in the Meet and 14 Confer Correspondence. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 16 Dated: October 20, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF OLAF LANDSGAARD 17 By: 18 Olaf Landsgaard, Attorney for Plaintiff, ERNEST DEAN SOEST 19 20 21 Dated: October 20, 2016 CUNNINGHAM SWAIM, LLP 22 By: 23 Michael J. Terhar Kathy A. Schmeckpeper Jonathan E. Hembree Attorneys for Defendants, Attorneys for Defendants, MOJAVE AIR AND SPACE PORT, a public entity, STUART WITT, and KEVIN WOJTKIEWICZ 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 512.0033 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Based upon the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, the Court 3 ORDERS: 4 1. This action is STAYED; 5 2. No later than May 19, 2017, counsel SHALL file a joint report detailing the status of the placement of the F-100; 6 7 3. All case deadlines are STAYED; 8 4. Plaintiff may file a first amended complaint in this action within 30 days of the F-100 placement, which will address the issues raised in the Meet and 9 Confer Correspondence. 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 20, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION TO STAY ACTION; [PROPOSED] ORDER 512.0033

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?