Weikel v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

ORDER GRANTING Stipulated Request for Extension of Time. Defendant has until July 26, 2017, to submit her response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All other dates in the Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/19/2017. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105-1545 Telephone: (415) 977-8929 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-mail: Margaret.Branick-Abilla@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 10 11 12 MELISSA VIRGINIA WEIKEL, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 16 NANCY A. BERRYHILL,1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 17 Defendant. 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )) Case No.: 1:16-cv-01336-SKO ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 22) 19 20 Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation for Extension of Time (Doc. 22), IT IS HEREBY 21 ORDERED that Defendant has until July 26, 2017, to submit her response to Plaintiff’s Opening 22 Brief. All other dates in the Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 19, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto 1 . Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should automatically be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Order Granting Stipulated Request for Extension of Time; 1:16-cv-01336-SKO 1 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Stipulated Request for Extension of Time; 1:16-cv-01336-SKO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?