Weikel v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
23
ORDER GRANTING Stipulated Request for Extension of Time. Defendant has until July 26, 2017, to submit her response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All other dates in the Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/19/2017. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105-1545
Telephone: (415) 977-8929
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-mail: Margaret.Branick-Abilla@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION
10
11
12
MELISSA VIRGINIA WEIKEL,
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
16
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,1 Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
17
Defendant.
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
))
Case No.: 1:16-cv-01336-SKO
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
(Doc. 22)
19
20
Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation for Extension of Time (Doc. 22), IT IS HEREBY
21
ORDERED that Defendant has until July 26, 2017, to submit her response to Plaintiff’s Opening
22
Brief. All other dates in the Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated:
June 19, 2017
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
1
.
Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should automatically be substituted for Acting
Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Order Granting Stipulated Request for Extension of Time; 1:16-cv-01336-SKO
1
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Granting Stipulated Request for Extension of Time; 1:16-cv-01336-SKO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?