Smith v. Goss, et al.
Filing
70
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 69 Third Motion to Modify Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/16/2020. Discovery Deadline: November 2, 2020; Exhaustion Motion Deadline: January 4, 2021; Dispositive Motion Deadline: February 16, 2021. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
CHANELO, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Case No. 1:16-cv-01356-NONE-BAM (PC)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ THIRD
MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING
ORDER
(ECF No. 69)
Discovery Deadline: November 2, 2020
Exhaustion Motion Deadline: January 4,
2021
Dispositive Motion Deadline: February 16,
2021
18
19
Plaintiff Lawrence Christopher Smith (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se
20
and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action
21
proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint as to the excessive force claim of March 13, 2013
22
against Defendants Sotelo, Chanelo, Wattree, Hunt, Castro, Gonzalez, Ramirez, and Rodriguez.
23
Pursuant to the Court’s May 19, 2020 order granting in part Defendants’ second motion to
24
modify the scheduling order, discovery was to be completed by September 18, 2020, exhaustion
25
motions were to be filed by November 18, 2020, and dispositive motions were to be filed by
26
February 16, 2021. (ECF No. 67.)
27
28
Currently before the Court is Defendants’ third motion to modify the scheduling order,
filed September 3, 2020. (ECF No. 69.) Defendants state that, as a result of the continuing
1
1
COVID-19 crisis, Defendants have been prevented from completing Plaintiff’s deposition until
2
recently, and there are no available deposition dates prior to the current discovery deadline of
3
September 18, 2020. Defendants have reserved time to take Plaintiff’s deposition by video on
4
September 24, 2020, and believe that the deposition could be completed, absent the filing of a
5
motion for protective order or a further outbreak of COVID-19 at Plaintiff’s institution, by
6
October 15, 2020. Defendants therefore request that the Court modify the current scheduling
7
order to extend the deadlines for completion of discovery and exhaustion summary judgment
8
motions by forty-five days, and keep the deadline to file non-exhaustion summary judgment
9
motions in place. (Id.)
10
11
Plaintiff has not yet had an opportunity to file a response, but the Court finds a response is
unnecessary. The motion is deemed submitted. Local Rule 230(l).
12
Having considered the request, the Court finds good cause to grant, the requested
13
extensions of the discovery and exhaustion motion deadlines. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4).
14
Defendants have worked diligently to meet the deadlines set by the Court for taking Plaintiff’s
15
deposition and filing dispositive motions, but those deadlines are not feasible due to the
16
circumstances surrounding the COVID-19 outbreak. The Court finds that Plaintiff will not be
17
prejudiced by the extensions granted here.
18
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
19
1. Defendants’ third motion to modify the scheduling order, (ECF No. 69), is
20
GRANTED;
2. The deadline for completion of all discovery, including Plaintiff’s deposition, is
21
22
extended from September 18, 2020 to November 2, 2020;
23
3. The deadline for filing motions for summary judgment for failure to exhaust
24
administrative remedies is extended from November 18, 2020 to January 4, 2021;
25
4. The deadline for filing all dispositive motions (other than a motion for summary
26
judgment for failure to exhaust) remains February 16, 2021; and
27
///
28
///
2
1
5. A request for an extension of a deadline set in this order must be filed on or before the
2
expiration of the deadline in question and will only be granted on a showing of good
3
cause.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
September 16, 2020
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?