Johnson v. North Kern State Prison et al

Filing 34

ORDER striking 33 Response to Defendant's Answer signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/18/2017. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 CEDRIC CHESTER JOHNSON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 v. NORTH KERN STATE PRISON, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:16-cv-01371-DAD-BAM (PC) ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S ANSWER (ECF No. 33) 16 Plaintiff Cedric Chester Johnson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 17 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 18 Plaintiff’s claim for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On March 22, 2017, Defendant Speakman answered Plaintiff’s complaint.1 (ECF No. 19 20 27.) On April 13, 2017, Plaintiff filed a response to Defendant Speakman’s answer. (ECF No. 21 33.) 22 In relevant part, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that there shall be a 23 complaint, an answer to a complaint, and, if the court orders one, a reply to an answer. Fed. R. 24 Civ. P. 7(a). The Court has not ordered a reply to Defendant’s answer and declines to make such 25 an order. 26 27 1 28 Defendants Rocha, Jones and Kennenten have not yet been served with the summons and complaint in this matter. Service by the United States Marshal is pending. (ECF No. 30.) 1 1 2 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s response to the answer, filed on April 13, 2017 (ECF No. 33), is HEREBY STRICKEN from the record. 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara April 18, 2017 6 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?