West v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 27

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for Defendant to have a 30-day extension of time, from October 23, 2017, until November 22, 2017, to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. All other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/18/2017. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BARRY DANA WEST, 12 13 14 15 Case No.: 1:16-cv-01377-EPG Plaintiff, STIPULATION & ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 16 17 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective 19 20 21 22 23 counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time, from October 23, 2017 until November 22, 2017, to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. All other dates in the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. This is Defendant’s first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully submits 24 that good cause exists for the requested extension because additional time is needed to review 25 and evaluate the administrative record, to consider the issues raised in Plaintiff’s Motion, to 26 accommodate Defendant’s counsel’s competing workload demands, including an increase in the 27 number of cases requiring briefing, and to determine whether options exist for settlement. 28 Plaintiff does not oppose Defendant’s request for an extension of time. 1 1 2 Respectfully submitted, Dated: October 17, 2017 3 CERNEY KREUZE & LOTT, LLP By: /s/ Shellie Lott* SHELLIE LOTT Attorneys for Plaintiff [*As authorized by e-mail on Oct. 17, 2017] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dated: October 18, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 11 12 13 By: /s/ Margaret Branick-Abilla ___ MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 ORDER Based on the above stipulation by the parties, Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of 3 time, from October 23, 2017 until November 22, 2017, to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for 4 Summary Judgment. All other dates in the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be extended 5 accordingly. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: October 18, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?