Brooke v. D.P.R.L. Investments, LLC

Filing 4

ORDER RELATING Cases, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/20/2016. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1406 AWI JLT ORDER RELATING CASES v. 14 H&K PARTNERSHIP, a California partnership dba Best Economy Inn & Suites, 15 Defendant. ____________________________________ 16 17 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1407 LJO JLT v. C & S CHONG INVESTMENT CORPORATION, a California corporation dba La Quinta Inn Bakersfield North, 22 Defendant. ____________________________________ 23 THERESA BROOKE, 24 25 26 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1408 DAD JLT Plaintiff, v. 27 JDS HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Days Inn Bakersfield, 28 Defendant. 1 1 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 2 3 4 5 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1409 AWI JLT v. JHP HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC., a California corporation dba Ramada Limited Bakersfield North, Defendant. 6 7 ____________________________________ 8 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 12 13 14 v. D.P.R.L. INVESTMENTS, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Hotel Rosedale, Defendant. ____________________________________ THERESA BROOKE, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 24 25 26 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1411 DAD JLT Plaintiff, v. KOO JIN HYUN & CHU MYUNG HEE, trustees of the KOO JIN HYUN & CHU MYUNG HEE TRUST dba Hampton Inn & Suites Bakersfield North-Airport, Defendant. ____________________________________ THERESA BROOKE, 22 23 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1410 LJO JLT Case No.: 1:16-cv-1414 LJO JLT Plaintiff, v. PRIME HOSPITALITY SERVICES, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Hampton Inn & Suites Bakersfield/Hwy 58, Defendant. 27 28 2 1 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 2 3 4 5 6 7 v. RP GOLDEN STATE MGT, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Garden Suites Inn, Defendant. ____________________________________ THERESA BROOKE, 8 9 10 11 12 13 16 17 18 19 v. YEHS FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST dba Rodeway Inn & Suites Bakersfield, Defendant. ____________________________________ THERESA BROOKE, 22 23 24 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1449 LJO SKO Plaintiff, v. KPK, INC., a California corporation dba Travelodge Turlock, Defendant. ____________________________________ THERESA BROOKE, 20 21 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1416 LJO JLT Plaintiff, 14 15 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1415 LJO JLT Case No.: 1:16-cv-1451 AWI BAM Plaintiff, v. S&B HOLDINGS TURLOCK, L.P., a California limited partnership dba Hampton Inn Turlock, Defendant. 25 26 27 28 3 1 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 2 3 4 5 6 7 v. LILJENQUIST MODESTO COMPANY, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Modesto Hotel, Defendant. ____________________________________ THERESA BROOKE, 8 9 10 11 12 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1454 DAD SKO Case No.: 1:16-cv-1455 DAD EPG Plaintiff, v. METRO HOSPITALITY SERVICES, INC., a California corporation dba Hampton Inn Fresno NW, 13 Defendant. ____________________________________ 14 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 19 20 v. JAYESHKUMAR PATEL, an individual; PRAFULBHAI PATEL, an individual, both individuals dba Budget Inn Modesto, Defendant. ____________________________________ THERESA BROOKE, 21 22 23 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1456 LJO EPG Case No.: 1:16-cv-1465 AWI SKO Plaintiff, v. 24 KHATRI BROTHERS, L.P., a California limited partnership dba Clarion Modesto, 25 Defendant. 26 27 28 4 1 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 2 3 4 5 6 7 v. A&A TARZANA PLAZA, LP, a California limited partnership dba Hilton Garden Inn Clovis, Defendant. ____________________________________ THERESA BROOKE, 8 9 10 11 12 13 16 17 18 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1502 DAD SKO Plaintiff, v. AKSHAR, INC., a California corporation dba Parkside Inn Fresno, Defendant. ____________________________________ THERESA BROOKE, 14 15 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1499 AWI MJS Case No.: 1:16-cv-1503 DAD SAB Plaintiff, v. THANDI ENTERPRISES, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Holiday Inn Express Fresno, 19 Defendant. ____________________________________ 20 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 21 22 23 24 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1505 DAD BAM v. BHAGAT BHAVESH, an individual dba Rodeway Inn Fresno, Defendant. 25 26 27 28 5 1 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 2 3 4 5 6 7 v. FRESNO AIRPORT HOTELS, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Ramada Fresno Airport, Defendant. ____________________________________ THERESA BROOKE, 8 9 10 11 12 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1506 DAD SAB Case No.: 1:16-cv-1508 LJO EPG Plaintiff, v. KAINTH BROTHERS, INC., a California corporation dba Country Inn Suites Fresno North, 13 Defendant. ____________________________________ 14 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1509 LJO SKO v. SHIV HOTELS, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Hampton Inn Fresno, 19 Defendant. ____________________________________ 20 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 21 22 23 24 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1510 LJO EPG v. SHIV HOTELS, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Hampton Inn Fresno, Defendant. 25 26 27 28 6 1 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 2 3 4 5 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1511 LJO EPG v. SHRIGI, INC., a California corporation dba Welcome Inn Fresno, 6 Defendant. ____________________________________ 7 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 v. THE DAE SUNG & HEE JAE CHA TRUST dba Quality Inn Tulare, 11 12 13 Defendant. ____________________________________ THERESA BROOKE, 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1521 AWI BAM Plaintiff, v. HANFORD INVESTORS, INC., a California corporation dba Comfort Inn Hanford, Defendant. ____________________________________ THERESA BROOKE, 20 21 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1520 LJO BAM Case No.: 1:16-cv-1522 LJO SAB Plaintiff, v. INTERLINK PROPERTIES L.P., a California limited partnership dba Hampton Inn Visalia, Defendant. 25 26 27 28 7 1 THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, 2 3 4 5 6 7 v. NMA HOSPITALITY LLC, a California limited liability company dba La Quinta Tulare, Defendant. ____________________________________ THERESA BROOKE, 8 9 10 11 Case No.: 1:16-cv-1529 DAD SAB Case No.: 1:16-cv-1530 DAD MJS Plaintiff, v. TERRA INVESTMENTS I, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Charter Inn Suites, 12 Defendant. 13 14 In each of the cases listed in the caption, the plaintiff complains that each of the defendants 15 acted/failed to act in nearly the identical, if not the identical, manner related to compliance with the 16 Americans with Disabilities Act. 17 The Court’s review of the cases reveals that the actions are related, as that term is defined in 18 Local Rule 123. The actions involve overlapping questions of law and fact and are based on the same 19 or similar claim and assignment to the same Magistrate Judge is likely to effect a substantial savings 20 of judicial effort. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 21 1. Each of the cases noted above, SHALL be related; 22 2. Each of the cases, not already assigned to the docket of Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. 23 Thurston, SHALL be reassigned with the assigned District Judge remaining the same. 24 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 20, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 8

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?