Pruitt v. Key Energy Services, LLC
Filing
28
ORDER RE INFORMAL DISCOVERY DISPUTE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall appear for deposition on October 5, 2017 at a time and place to be noticed by Defendant; The parties may file a stipulation should they agree to have Plaintiffs deposition occur on a different date prior to the discovery deadline; and Failure to appear in compliance with this order will result in the issuance of sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/27/2017. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT PRUITT,
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER RE INFORMAL DISCOVERY
DISPUTE
v.
13
14
Case No. 1:16-cv-01457-DAD-JLT
KEY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff Robert Pruitt filed this action on September 29, 2016, alleging violations of the
18 Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. and California law. Following a brief stay
19 pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, the scheduling order issued on February 14, 2017. Non-expert
20 discovery in this action is set to close on October 16, 2017. On September 22, 2017, Plaintiff
21 filed a motion to enforce judgment, and alternately, to continue the discovery deadlines in this
22 action which is set for oral argument before the district judge on November 7, 2017.
23
The parties are currently having a dispute as to whether Plaintiff should be required to
24 appear for deposition or if the deposition should be continued due to the pending motion. On
25 September 27, 2017, the parties participated in an informal discovery dispute conference before
26 the undersigned. Counsel Galvin Kennedy and George Moschopoulos appeared telephonically
27 for Plaintiff and counsel Kalley Aman appeared telephonically for Defendant.
28 / / /
1
Based on the discussion during the informal conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
1
2 that:
1.
3
Plaintiff shall appear for deposition on October 5, 2017 at a time and place to be
noticed by Defendant;
4
2.
5
The parties may file a stipulation should they agree to have Plaintiff’s deposition
occur on a different date prior to the discovery deadline; and
6
3.
7
Failure to appear in compliance with this order will result in the issuance of
sanctions.
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11 Dated:
September 27, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?