Barrera v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
28
ORDER re Stipulation for Award of Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) (ECF No. 27 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/20/2018. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($7,000.00) as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 are awarded subject to the terms of the stipulation. (Valdez, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
FORSLUND LAW, LLC
Jacqueline A. Forslund # 154575
P.O. Box 4476
Sunriver, OR 97707
Telephone:
541-419-0074
Fax:
541-593-4452
Email:
jaf@forslundlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
DAVID BARRERA,
)
)
Plaintiff
)
)
v.
)
)
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
)
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant
)
)
____________________________________)
Case No. 1:16-CV-01466-SAB
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR AWARD
OF ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE
ACT (EAJA)
(ECF No. 27)
16
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel,
17
18
subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal
Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d), in the amount of SEVEN THOUSAND
19
dollars and ZERO cents ($7,000.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services
20
rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28
21
U.S.C. sec. 2412(d).
22
23
24
25
26
After the Court issues an order for payment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the
government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to
Plaintiff’s attorney.
The government’s ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the
fees and expenses are subject to an offset allowed under the United States Department of the
Treasury’s Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). After the order of
EAJA fees and expenses is entered, the government will determine if they are subject to an offset. If
27
it is determined that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees and expenses are not subject to an offset under Astrue v.
28
Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010) and the Department of Treasury’s Offset Program, then the check for
1
1
EAJA fees and expenses shall be made payable to Jacqueline A. Forslund, based upon Plaintiff’s
2
assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney. The parties agree that whether these checks are
3
made payable to Plaintiff or Jacqueline A. Forslund, such checks shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s
4
5
attorney at the following address: Jacqueline A. Forslund, Forslund Law LLC, P.O. Box 4476,
Sunriver, Oregon 97707. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request
for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant
6
under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from,
7
and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s Counsel may have relating to EAJA
8
attorney fees in connection with this action.
9
Respectfully submitted,
10
11
Date: April 19, 2018
12
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney at Law
13
/s/Jacqueline A. Forslund
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney for Plaintiff
14
15
16
Date: April 19, 2018
17
18
MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
19
/s/Beatrice Na
BEATRICE NA
Special Assistant United States Attorney
*By email authorization
Attorney for Defendant
20
21
22
23
24
///
///
25
///
26
27
28
///
///
2
ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that attorney fees in the
3
4
5
6
amount of SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($7,000.00) as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 are
awarded subject to the terms of the stipulation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated:
April 20, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?