Doe v. County of Kern et al

Filing 13

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/12/2017. Pleading Amendment Deadline 4/10/2017. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 1/18/2017; Non-Expert 9/12/2017; Expert 10/17/2017. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 5/16/2017 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 10/24/2017; Hearing by 11/21/2017. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 11/7/2017; Hearing by 12/8/2017. Settlement Conference set for 1/11/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS), Fresno, before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng. Pretrial Conference set for 1/19/2018 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Jury Trial set for 2/26/2018 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

JANE DOE,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14
15

v.
COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1: 16-CV-01469 - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 4/10/2017
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 1/18/2017
Non-Expert: 9/12/2017
Expert: 10/17/2017
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
5/16/2017 at 9:30 a.m.

16
17

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 10/24/2017
Hearing: 11/21/2017

18
19

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 11/7/2017
Hearing: 12/8/2017

20
21
22

Settlement Conference:
1/11/2018 at 10:00 a.m.
Courtroom 6, Fresno

23
24

26

Pre-Trial Conference:
1/19/2018 at 9:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

27

Trial:

25

28
1

2/26/2018 at 8:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
Jury trial: 5-14 days

1

I.

January 11, 2017.

2
3

Date of Scheduling Conference

II.

Appearances of Counsel

4

Neil Gehlawat appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

5

Kathleen Rivera appeared on behalf of the County.

6

James Weakley appeared on behalf of George Anderson.

7

III.

Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Pleading Amendment Deadline

motion to amend, no later than April 10, 2017.
IV.

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

on or before January 18, 2017.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before
September 12, 2017, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before October 17, 2017.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses1, in writing, on or before September 19,

16

2017, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before October 3, 2017. The written designation of

17

retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),

18

and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in

19

compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered

20

through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

21

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

22

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

23

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

24

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

25
26

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.

27
28

1

In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health evaluation, the
examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the expert’s
opinions in this regard.

2

A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for May 16, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. before the

1
2

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,

3

California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the

4

conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to [e-mail].

5

The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be

6

completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this

7

order. Counsel may appear via CourtCall.

8

VI.

All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

9
10

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule

than October 24, 2017 and heard on or before November 21, 2017.
No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it

11
12

is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written

13

discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party

14

with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by

15

agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly

16

shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the

17

obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule

18

this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at

19

[phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251

20

with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped

21

from the Court’s calendar.
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than November 7, 2017, and heard no

22
23

later than December 8, 2017, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate

24

Judge, at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. In scheduling such motions,

25

counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.

26

VII.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

27

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

28

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues
3

1

to be raised in the motion.

2

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

3

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

4

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

5

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

6

expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

7
8

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of

9

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

10

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint

11

statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred

12
13

as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to

14

comply may result in the motion being stricken.

15

VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date

16

January 19, 2018 at 9:30 a.m.

17

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

18

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

19

directly to Judge Thurston’s chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

20
21

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

22

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

23

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

24

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

25

IX.

Trial Date

26

February 26, 2018 at 8:30 a.m.

27

A.

This is a jury trial.

28

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 5-14 days.
4

C.

1

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

2

California, Rule 285.

3

X.

4

Settlement Conference
A Settlement Conference is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. January 11, 2018 before the Honorable

5

Michael J. Seng, in Courtroom 6 of the Robert E. Coyle Federal Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street,

6

Fresno, California.

7

Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall

8

appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority

9

to negotiate and settle the case on any terms2 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a

10

serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the

11

procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.

12

At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via

13

fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful3 settlement demand which includes a

14

brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than fourteen days

15

before the settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of

16

the offer or with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a

17

settlement is appropriate.

18

If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their

19

Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall

20

not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

21
22

At least five court days prior to the Settlement Conference, the parties shall submit, directly to

23
24
25
26
27
28

2

Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements
are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a
person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the
process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the
authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent
demand.
3
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,
however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should
trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the
settlement conference via stipulation.

5

1

Judge Seng’s chambers by e-mail to [e-mail], a Confidential Settlement

2

Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on

3

any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference

4

Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the

5

Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.

6

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

7

A.

A brief statement of the facts of the case.

8

B.

A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which
the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on

9

the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.

10
11

C.

A summary of the proceedings to date.

12

D.

An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.

13

E.

The relief sought.

14

F.

The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of
past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

15
16

XI.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

17

Techniques to Shorten Trial

18

Not applicable at this time.

19

XII.

There are no pending related matters.

20
21

Related Matters Pending

XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

22
23

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

24

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently

25

handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided

26

in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

27

California.

28

///
6

1
2

XIV. Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

3

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

4

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered

5

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

6

subsequent status conference.

7

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

8

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

9

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

10

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

11

for granting the relief requested.

12

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

13
14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 12, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7