Doe v. County of Kern et al

Filing 99

STIPULATION and ORDER 80 Regarding Submissions Containing Allegedly Confidential Information, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/20/2017. (Hall, S)

Case 1:16-cv-01469-JLT Document 80 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

James D. Weakley, Esq.
Ashley N. Torres, Esq.

Bar No. 082853
Bar No. 312120

Weakley & Arendt, LLP
1630 East Shaw Ave., Suite 176
Fresno, California 93710
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant, George Anderson

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SAMANTHA VAZQUEZ,

12
Plaintiff,
13
v.

14
15

COUNTY OF KERN, et al.,

16

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01469 JLT
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING SUBMISSIONS
CONTAINING ALLEGEDLY
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

17
18
STIPULATION
19
The parties to this action jointly, through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as
20
follows:
21
1.
22

On November 20, 2017, an order was issued by the Court granting Plaintiff leave to

submit her entire oppositions to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. 65). From

23
the date of submission, the parties were given 14 days to meet and confer on and submit to
24
chambers a jointly agreed upon redacted version to be entered into the public record. If the
25
parties fail to agree on a redacted version, they will each submit their separate proposals for
26
redactions along with a brief statement outlining their differences to chambers for review.
27
28

1

Case 1:16-cv-01469-JLT Document 80 Filed 11/30/17 Page 2 of 3
1

2.

The parties now request that this order also include Defendants replies to Plaintiff’s

2

oppositions, including all supporting documents, under seal to continue to protect the

3

information that Defendant Anderson is alleging as confidential. From the date of submission,

4

the parties will then have 14 days to meet and confer on and submit to chambers a jointly

5

agreed upon redacted version to be entered into the public record. If the parties fail to agree on

6

a redacted version, they will each submit their separate proposals for redactions along with a

7

brief statement outlining their differences to chambers for review.

8
SO STIPULATED.
9
10
11

DATED: November 30, 2017

WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP

12
By:

13
14
15
16

/s/ James D. Weakley
James D. Weakley
Ashley N. Torres
Attorneys for Defendant,
George Anderson

DATED: November 30, 2017
LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS C. SEABAUGH

17
18

By:

19
20

/s/
Thomas C. Seabugh
Thomas C. Seabaugh
Attorney for Plaintiff

21
22

OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL

DATED: November 30, 2017

23
24
25

By:

/s/
Kathleen Rivera
Kathleen Rivera
Attorneys for Defendant,
County of Kern

26
27
28

2

Case 1:16-cv-01469-JLT Document 80 Filed 11/30/17 Page 3 of 3
1

ORDER

2
3

Based upon the foregoing stipulation of the parties, the Court ORDERS:
Defendants are granted leave to submit their entire replies to Plaintiff’s oppositions, including

4
all supporting documents, under seal. From the date of that submission, the parties will have 14
5
6

days to meet and confer on and submit to chambers a jointly agreed upon redacted version to be

7

entered in the public record. If the parties fail to agree on a redacted version, they will each

8

submit their separate proposals for redactions along with a brief statement outlining their

9

differences to chambers for review.

10
11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

12/20/17
UNITED STATES MAGISTRAGE JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3