Taylor v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al

Filing 15

ORDER CLOSING CASE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/30/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Hall, S)

1 Allyson K. Thompson, Bar No. 235933
[e-mail]
2 KRING & CHUNG, LLP
38 Corporate Park
3 Irvine, CA 92606-5105
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff
CHRISTINE TAYLOR
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 CHRISTINE TAYLOR,
12

vs.

Plaintiff,

13

THE GEO GROUP, INC. dba GEO
14 CALIFORNIA, INC., a Florida
corporation; GEO CORRECTIONS AND
15 DETENTION, LLC, a Florida limited
liability company; and DOES 1 through
16 20, inclusive,
Defendants.

17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 1:16-CV-01484 JLT
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
THEREON
(Doc. 14)

18
19

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

20

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff CHRISTINE

21 TAYLOR, and Defendants THE GEO GROUP, INC. dba GEO CALIFORNIA, INC.
22 and GEO CORRECTIONS AND DETENTION, LLC, through their respective
23 counsel of record and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii), that the Court dismiss
24 the above-entitled complaint and matter, in their entirety, together with all named
25 parties, with prejudice. Each party shall bear her/its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
26 ///
27 ///
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
C:\Users\tlamley\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\L5EY9VBD\Stipulation to Dismiss Complaint
(revised).docx

1

SO STIPULATED.

2
3 Dated: March 16, 2017

KRING & CHUNG, LLP

4
By:

5

Allyson K. Thompson
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CHRISTINE TAYLOR

6
7
8
9 Dated: March _____, 2017
10

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

11

By:

12
13
14

Matthew E. Farmer
Natalie M. Jansen
Attorneys for Defendants
GEO CORRECTIONS AND
DETENTION, LLC

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

1

ORDER

2

The parties have stipulated to dismiss this matter (Doc. 14) and, in doing so, rely upon

3 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a). Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides,
4 “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal
5 signed by all parties who have appeared.”. . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has been
6 filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P.
7 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Thus, the Clerk of
8 Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the stipulation as dictated by Rule 41(a).
9
10 IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12

Dated:

March 30, 2017

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON