R. Q. v. Tehachapi Unified School District

Filing 101

ORDER ADOPTING 98 Findings and Recommendations and ORDER GRANTING 96 Motion for Approval of Minor's Compromise signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/27/2020. Dispositional Documents due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

R.Q., (A minor by and through his parent and )
)
Guardian ad Litem, CHARIS QUATRO),
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL
)
DISTRICT,
)
)
)
Defendant.

No.: 1:16-cv-01485 NONE JLT
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO APPROVE THE
MINOR’S COMPROMISE
(Doc. No. 98)

17
18

On October 7, 2020, plaintiff filed an unopposed application seeking approval of a minor’s

19

compromise. (Doc. No. 97.) The court referred the matter to a United States Magistrate Judge

20

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 7, 2020, the assigned

21

magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the application be granted.

22

(Doc. No. 98.) The findings and recommendations provided a fourteen-day objection period. (Id. at

23

5.) No objections were filed. (See Doc. 99 (defendant’s non-objection).)

24

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court conducted a de novo

25

review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and

26

recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly,

27

1.

28

adopted in full.

The findings and recommendations filed on October 7, 2020 (Doc. No. 98) are

1

1

2.

The motion for approval of minor’s compromise (Doc. No. 96) is GRANTED.

2

3.

The parties shall have 30 days to submit appropriate dispositional documents to the

3

court.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 27, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2