R. Q. v. Tehachapi Unified School District

Filing 9

ORDER GRANTING 3 Motion to Appoint Charis Quatro as Guardian ad Litem for Minor Plaintiff R.Q., signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/7/2016. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

R.Q.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT,

15
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-01485 - LJO - JLT
ORDER GRANTING THE MOTION TO APPOINT
CHARIS QUATRO AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM
FOR MINOR PLAINTIFF R.Q.
(Doc. 3)

16
On October 4, 2016, Charis Quatro initiated this action on behalf of minor Plaintiff R.Q., her

17
18

son, and requested to be appointed as the guardian ad litem. (Docs. 1, 3)

19

I.

20

Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem
Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[a] minor . . . who does not have a duly

21

appointed representative may sue by a next friend or by a guardian ad litem.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2).

22

In addition, a court “must appoint a guardian ad litem - or issue another appropriate order - to protect a

23

minor or incompetent person who is unrepresented in an action.” Id. The capacity of an individual to

24

sue is determined “by the law of the individual’s domicile.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(b).

25

Because R.Q. resides in California, the law of this state governs. Under California law, an

26

individual under the age of eighteen is a minor, and a minor may bring suit as long as a guardian

27

conducts the proceedings. Cal. Fam. Code §§ 6502, 6601. A guardian ad litem may be appointed to

28

represent the minor’s interests. Cal. Code Civ. P. § 372(a).
1

1

II.

2

Discussion and Analysis
In determining whether to appoint a particular guardian ad litem, the court must consider

3

whether the minor and the guardian have divergent interests. Cal. Code Civ. P. § 372(b)(1). “When

4

there is a potential conflict between a perceived parental responsibility and an obligation to assist the

5

court in achieving a just and speedy determination of the action, a court has the right to select a

6

guardian ad litem who is not a parent if that guardian would best protect the child’s interests.” Williams

7

v. Super. Ct., 147 Cal. App. 4th 36, 38 (Cal. Ct. App. 4th 2007) (internal quotation marks and citation

8

omitted). “[I]f the parent has an actual or potential conflict of interest with his child, the parent has no

9

right to control or influence the child's litigation.” Id. at 50.

10

Here, Plaintiff R.Q. is the seven-year-old son of Charis Quatro (Doc. 3 at 2), and is a minor

11

under California law. See Cal. Fam. Code § 6502. As a minor, his ability to bring suit is contingent

12

upon the appointment of a guardian ad litem. Upon review of the Complaint, it does not appear there

13

are adverse interests. Ms. Quatro does not have competing claims with Plaintiff, because R.Q. is the

14

only plaintiff in this action, and the only claims are asserted on his behalf. Accordingly, appointment

15

of Ms. Quatro as guardian ad litem for her son is appropriate. See Burke v. Smith, 252 F.3d 1260, 1264

16

(11th Cir. 2001) (“Generally, when a minor is represented by a parent who is a party to the lawsuit and

17

who has the same interests as the child there is no inherent conflict of interest.”); see also Anthem Life

18

Ins. Co. v. Olguin, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37669, at *7 (E.D. Cal. May 9, 2007) (observing that “[a]

19

parent is generally appointed guardian ad litem”).

20

III.

Conclusion and Order

21

The decision whether to appoint a guardian ad litem is “normally left to the sound discretion of

22

the trial court.” United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, etc., 795 F.2d 796, 804 (9th Cir. 1986). Here, it

23

does not appear Ms. Quatro has conflicting interests, and as such she may be appointed to represent

24

the interests of her son. Therefore, the Court is acting within its discretion to grant her application to

25

be appointed as the guardian ad litem.

26

///

27

///

28

///
2

1

Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

2

1.

3
4

The motion for appointment of Charis Quatro as guardian ad litem for R.Q. (Doc. 2) is
GRANTED; and

2.

5

Charis Quatro is appointed to act as guardian ad litem for Plaintiff R.Q., and is
authorized to prosecute this action on his behalf.

6
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 7, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3