Lateef v. City of Madera et al

Filing 31

ORDER GRANTING the parties' request to stay the case, document 28 , pending resolution of a related case, Case No. MCV 072672 in Madera County Superior Court. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/22/2017. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JUNAID LATEEF, 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 Case No. 1:16-cv-01488-SKO ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ REQUEST TO STAY CASE (Doc. 28) CITY OF MADERA, et al., 13 Defendants. _____________________________________/ 14 15 16 Before the Court is the parties’ joint Stipulation and Order to Stay Action (the “Request”), 17 in which the parties request to stay this case pending the resolution of a related case―Case No. 18 MCV 072672 in Madera County Superior Court (the “Related Case”).1 (Doc. 28.) For good cause 19 shown, the Court GRANTS this Request. (See id.) Accordingly, the Court STAYS this case 20 pending the resolution of the Related Case. The Court further ORDERS that, within 21 days of 21 the final resolution of the Related Case, the parties shall jointly (1) file a request to end the stay in 22 this case; or (2) notify the Court of the settlement of this matter. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 22, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 The Request is not signed by a Defendant in this action―Madera City Council. (See Doc. 28.) However, Defendant Madera City Council notified the Court on May 18, 2017 that it “agree[s] to the stay of this action.” (Doc. 30.) As such, all parties who have appeared in this case are in agreement regarding the Request. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?