Stoltzner v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

STIPULATION to Extend Briefing Schedule and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/4/2017. It is hereby ordered that plaintiff may have an extension of time for Plaintiff to provide Defendant with Plaintiff's Settlement Letter Brief to and including May 2, 2017; Defendant may have an extension of time to June 6, 2017 to file her response. All other deadlines in the scheduling order are modified accordingly. (Valdez, E)

Download PDF
4 Steven G. Rosales Attorney at Law: 222224 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-5491 E-mail _steven.rosales@rohlfinglaw.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff ANDY D. STOLTZNER 1 2 3 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ANDY D. STOLTZNER, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting 14 Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant 16 ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-01490-EPG ) ) STIPULATION TO EXTEND ) BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TO THE HONORABLE ERICA P. GROSJEAN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: Plaintiff Andy D. Stoltzner (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”), through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate, pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order, to extend the time for Plaintiff to provide Defendant with Plaintiff’s Settlement Letter Brief to May 2, 2017; and that Defendant shall have until June 6, 2017, to provide a response. 26 27 28 -1- 1 As the Court is aware, after a 5 year battle with terminal stage 4 cancer 2 Plaintiff’s Spouse passed away on September 30, 2016. The aftermath of this 3 traumatic event on both Counsel and his 9 year old son and 7 year old daughter was 4 immeasurable. Compounding the impact of this loss is the fact that Counsel’s 5 spouse was a former employee at Counsel’s Law Firm and her death was far 6 reaching in its impact on Counsel’s professional life as well. Due to the death, the 7 subsequent holiday period, and the need to find a permanent caregiver and the 8 required time to acclimate his children to that presence during his absence to meet 9 his professional obligations, Counsel required the additional time to prepare and 10 provide Defendant with Plaintiff’s Settlement Letter Brief. 11 Counsel for plaintiff does not anticipate this extraordinary request for more 12 time to become the rule and recognizes it is the extraordinary exception and 13 sincerely apologizes to the court for any inconvenience this may have had upon it 14 or its staff. /// 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// -2- 1 DATE: May 2, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING 2 /s/ Steven G. Rosales BY: _________________________ Steven G. Rosales Attorney for plaintiff ANDY D. STOLTZNER 3 4 5 Respectfully submitted, DATE: May 2, 2017 6 7 SANDRA R. BROWN Acting United States Attorney Donna L. Calvert Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 8 9 */S/- Carolyn B. Chen _________________________________ Carolyn B. Chen Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Defendant [*Via email authorization] 10 11 12 13 14 15 Order 16 Based on the above stipulation and good cause appearing therein, IT IS 17 HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff may have an extension of time for Plaintiff to 18 provide Defendant with Plaintiff’s Settlement Letter Brief to and including May 2, 19 2017; Defendant may have an extension of time to June 6, 2017 to file her 20 response. All other deadlines in the scheduling order are modified accordingly. 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 4, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?