Wolfe v. Tehachapi Unified School District

Filing 59

ORDER UNSEALING Prior 50 Order of Court signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/7/2018. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 J.T., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem Janice Wolfe, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 No. 1:16-cv-01492-DAD-JLT ORDER UNSEALING PRIOR ORDER OF COURT v. TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, (Doc. No. 50) Defendant. 17 18 In a prior sealed order, this court denied plaintiff’s appeal from an administrative law 19 judge’s ruling concerning an Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”) claim. As 20 explained in that order, the entire administrative record with respect to that claim had previously 21 been sealed, given the personal information regarding plaintiff, a minor child, appearing 22 throughout that record. (Doc. No. 50 at 10 n.9.) To accommodate any privacy concerns the 23 parties might have, the court directed that its order denying the IDEA appeal, which discussed the 24 sealed administrative record, initially be sealed as well. (Id.) The parties were then given 25 fourteen days from the date of service of that order to submit any proposed redactions necessary 26 to protect personal information of the minor child, along with a memorandum providing the 27 authority for the proposed redactions, and were advised that a failure to file these documents 28 would result in the court’s order being unsealed without further notice. (Id.) The order was 1 1 served on the parties on February 9, 2018. No requests for redaction have been filed, and the time 2 in which to do so has now passed. 3 Therefore, the Clerk of the Court is directed to unseal the court’s order of January 29, 4 2018 (Doc. No. 50) and enter it on the public docket. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: March 7, 2018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?