Brooke v. A&A Tarzana Plaza, L.P.
Filing
4
ORDER relating cases signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/20/2016. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1406 AWI JLT
ORDER RELATING CASES
v.
14
H&K PARTNERSHIP, a California
partnership dba Best Economy Inn & Suites,
15
Defendant.
____________________________________
16
17
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1407 LJO JLT
v.
C & S CHONG INVESTMENT
CORPORATION, a California corporation
dba La Quinta Inn Bakersfield North,
22
Defendant.
____________________________________
23
THERESA BROOKE,
24
25
26
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1408 DAD JLT
Plaintiff,
v.
27
JDS HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC, a
California limited liability company dba
Days Inn Bakersfield,
28
Defendant.
1
1
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
2
3
4
5
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1409 AWI JLT
v.
JHP HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC., a
California corporation dba Ramada Limited
Bakersfield North,
Defendant.
6
7
____________________________________
8
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
12
13
14
v.
D.P.R.L. INVESTMENTS, LLC, a
California limited liability company dba
Hotel Rosedale,
Defendant.
____________________________________
THERESA BROOKE,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
24
25
26
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1411 DAD JLT
Plaintiff,
v.
KOO JIN HYUN & CHU MYUNG HEE,
trustees of the KOO JIN HYUN & CHU
MYUNG HEE TRUST dba Hampton Inn &
Suites Bakersfield North-Airport,
Defendant.
____________________________________
THERESA BROOKE,
22
23
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1410 LJO JLT
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1414 LJO JLT
Plaintiff,
v.
PRIME HOSPITALITY SERVICES, LLC, a
California limited liability company dba
Hampton Inn & Suites Bakersfield/Hwy 58,
Defendant.
27
28
2
1
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
2
3
4
5
6
7
v.
RP GOLDEN STATE MGT, LLC, a
California limited liability company dba
Garden Suites Inn,
Defendant.
____________________________________
THERESA BROOKE,
8
9
10
11
12
13
16
17
18
19
v.
YEHS FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST dba
Rodeway Inn & Suites Bakersfield,
Defendant.
____________________________________
THERESA BROOKE,
22
23
24
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1449 LJO SKO
Plaintiff,
v.
KPK, INC., a California corporation dba
Travelodge Turlock,
Defendant.
____________________________________
THERESA BROOKE,
20
21
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1416 LJO JLT
Plaintiff,
14
15
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1415 LJO JLT
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1451 AWI BAM
Plaintiff,
v.
S&B HOLDINGS TURLOCK, L.P., a
California limited partnership dba Hampton
Inn Turlock,
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
3
1
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
2
3
4
5
6
7
v.
LILJENQUIST MODESTO COMPANY,
LLC, a California limited liability company
dba Modesto Hotel,
Defendant.
____________________________________
THERESA BROOKE,
8
9
10
11
12
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1454 DAD SKO
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1455 DAD EPG
Plaintiff,
v.
METRO HOSPITALITY SERVICES, INC.,
a California corporation dba Hampton Inn
Fresno NW,
13
Defendant.
____________________________________
14
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
19
20
v.
JAYESHKUMAR PATEL, an individual;
PRAFULBHAI PATEL, an individual, both
individuals dba Budget Inn Modesto,
Defendant.
____________________________________
THERESA BROOKE,
21
22
23
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1456 LJO EPG
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1465 AWI SKO
Plaintiff,
v.
24
KHATRI BROTHERS, L.P., a California
limited partnership dba Clarion Modesto,
25
Defendant.
26
27
28
4
1
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
2
3
4
5
6
7
v.
A&A TARZANA PLAZA, LP, a California
limited partnership dba Hilton Garden Inn
Clovis,
Defendant.
____________________________________
THERESA BROOKE,
8
9
10
11
12
13
16
17
18
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1502 DAD SKO
Plaintiff,
v.
AKSHAR, INC., a California corporation
dba Parkside Inn Fresno,
Defendant.
____________________________________
THERESA BROOKE,
14
15
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1499 AWI MJS
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1503 DAD SAB
Plaintiff,
v.
THANDI ENTERPRISES, LLC, a California
limited liability company dba Holiday Inn
Express Fresno,
19
Defendant.
____________________________________
20
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
21
22
23
24
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1505 DAD BAM
v.
BHAGAT BHAVESH, an individual dba
Rodeway Inn Fresno,
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
5
1
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
2
3
4
5
6
7
v.
FRESNO AIRPORT HOTELS, LLC, a
California limited liability company dba
Ramada Fresno Airport,
Defendant.
____________________________________
THERESA BROOKE,
8
9
10
11
12
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1506 DAD SAB
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1508 LJO EPG
Plaintiff,
v.
KAINTH BROTHERS, INC., a California
corporation dba Country Inn Suites Fresno
North,
13
Defendant.
____________________________________
14
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1509 LJO SKO
v.
SHIV HOTELS, LLC, a California limited
liability company dba Hampton Inn Fresno,
19
Defendant.
____________________________________
20
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
21
22
23
24
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1510 LJO EPG
v.
SHIV HOTELS, LLC, a California limited
liability company dba Hampton Inn Fresno,
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
6
1
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
2
3
4
5
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1511 LJO EPG
v.
SHRIGI, INC., a California corporation dba
Welcome Inn Fresno,
6
Defendant.
____________________________________
7
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
v.
THE DAE SUNG & HEE JAE CHA TRUST
dba Quality Inn Tulare,
11
12
13
Defendant.
____________________________________
THERESA BROOKE,
14
15
16
17
18
19
22
23
24
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1521 AWI BAM
Plaintiff,
v.
HANFORD INVESTORS, INC., a California
corporation dba Comfort Inn Hanford,
Defendant.
____________________________________
THERESA BROOKE,
20
21
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1520 LJO BAM
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1522 LJO SAB
Plaintiff,
v.
INTERLINK PROPERTIES L.P., a
California limited partnership dba Hampton
Inn Visalia,
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
7
1
THERESA BROOKE,
Plaintiff,
2
3
4
5
6
7
v.
NMA HOSPITALITY LLC, a California
limited liability company dba La Quinta
Tulare,
Defendant.
____________________________________
THERESA BROOKE,
8
9
10
11
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1529 DAD SAB
Case No.: 1:16-cv-1530 DAD MJS
Plaintiff,
v.
TERRA INVESTMENTS I, LLC, a
California limited liability company dba
Charter Inn Suites,
12
Defendant.
13
14
In each of the cases listed in the caption, the plaintiff complains that each of the defendants
15
acted/failed to act in nearly the identical, if not the identical, manner related to compliance with the
16
Americans with Disabilities Act.
17
The Court’s review of the cases reveals that the actions are related, as that term is defined in
18
Local Rule 123. The actions involve overlapping questions of law and fact and are based on the same
19
or similar claim and assignment to the same Magistrate Judge is likely to effect a substantial savings
20
of judicial effort. Thus, the Court ORDERS:
21
1.
Each of the cases noted above, SHALL be related;
22
2.
Each of the cases, not already assigned to the docket of Magistrate Judge Jennifer L.
23
Thurston, SHALL be reassigned with the assigned District Judge remaining the same.
24
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 20, 2016
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
8
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?