Xie v. De Young Properties, 5867 LP

Filing 4

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing and DENYING Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Request to Attend All Hearings Through Video Conference 3 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/1/2016. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 AGNES XIE, 9 Case No. 1:16-cv-1518-DAD-SKO ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE FILING AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO ATTEND ALL HEARINGS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 12 DE YOUNG PROPERTIES, 5867 LP, 13 Defendant. (Doc. 3.) 14 15 _____________________________________/ 16 ORDER 17 18 Plaintiff Agnes Xie, appearing pro se, filed this action on October 7, 2016. (Doc. 1.) On 19 October 24, 2016, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing” (the 20 “Motion”) and “Request for ADA Accommodation for Video Conference for all Future Hearings” 21 (the “Request”). (Doc. 3.) 22 In her Motion, Plaintiff seeks the Court’s permission to file documents electronically 23 through the Court’s case management/electronic case filing (“CM/ECF”) system. Pursuant to the 24 Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California (“Local Rules”), a 25 pro se party shall file and serve paper documents as required by the Rule. Local Rule 133(a). A 26 party appearing pro se may request an exception to the paper filing requirement from the court by 27 filing a stipulation of the parties or by motion. Local Rule 133(b)(2), (3). 28 // 1 Upon review of the pleadings in this action and the instant motion, in which Plaintiff 2 provides no reasons for the need to use electronic filing, the Court finds that this action does not 3 warrant an exception to the Local Rule. Plaintiff’s motion for permission to file through CM/ECF is, 4 therefore, DENIED. Plaintiff’s Request to attend hearings through video conference “as ADA accommodation” 5 6 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court will make reasonable accommodations for 7 Plaintiff’s medical condition, including permitting Plaintiff to appear at hearings telephonically, 8 on a case-by-case basis as this action proceeds. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: 12 November 1, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?