Xie v. De Young Properties, 5867 LP

Filing 65

ORDER ENLARGING Time to Complete Third Party Discovery and to Conduct the Deposition of Jerry De Young. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/23/2018. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 AGNES XIE, 7 8 9 10 11 Case No. 1:16-cv-01518-DAD-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO COMPLETE THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY AND TO CONDUCT THE DEPOSITION OF JERRY DE YOUNG v. DE YOUNG PROPOERTIES, 5418 L.P., Defendant. _____________________________________/ 12 ORDER 13 14 On May 23, 2018, the parties appeared telephonically for a conference to resolve certain 15 discovery issues. Plaintiff Agnes Xie appeared on her own behalf, and Jared Marshall, Esq., 16 appeared on behalf of Defendant De Young Properties, 5418 L.P. 17 After reviewing the parties’ submissions and hearing the parties’ arguments, and in 18 recognition of Plaintiff’s status as a pro se litigant, the Court hereby grants Plaintiff yet another— 19 and final—enlargement of time to complete certain non-expert discovery. Specifically, Plaintiff 20 shall have until July 6, 2018, to: (1) attempt to obtain, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 45, the 21 information sought from third parties First American Title Company, Alma Fletcher, Mark 22 Fletcher, and Tina Larson; and (2) conduct the deposition, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 30 or 23 31, of Jerry De Young. 24 This enlargement of time does not alter any other scheduling deadlines, including motion 25 deadlines, the pretrial conference, and trial date. As noted above, no further extensions of time 26 will be given, absent a showing of good cause. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 Dated: 2 May 23, 2018 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?