Randolph v. Lozovoy et al

Filing 37

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 36 Motion for Settlement Conference Rescheduling, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/16/18. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 COLIN M. RANDOLPH, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. R. LOZOVOY, et al., Case No. 1:16-cv-01528-DAD-EPG (PC) ORDER DENYING PLAINITFF’S MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE RESCHEDULING (ECF NO. 36) Defendants. 15 16 17 18 Colin Randolph (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 A settlement conference was set for April 2, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., before Magistrate Judge 20 Jennifer L. Thurston. (ECF No. 29). On March 27, 2018, Judge Thurston issued a minute 21 order vacating the settlement conference. The minute order stated, “In light of the information 22 contained in the defendants' settlement conference statement that the case is NOT in a 23 settlement posture and due to the failure of the plaintiff to provide a settlement conference 24 statement, the settlement conference set on 4/2/2018 is VACATED.” (ECF No. 35). 25 On April 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for settlement conference rescheduling. 26 (ECF No. 36). Plaintiff asks the Court to reschedule the settlement conference, if the Court 27 feels that having a settlement conference is beneficial or necessary. 28 The Court will deny Plaintiff’s motion, without prejudice. It does not appear that a 1 1 settlement conference would be beneficial at this time. Judge Thurston cancelled the 2 conference in part because information in Defendants’ conference statement led her to believe 3 it would not be fruitful. 4 The Court will revisit the issue of setting a settlement conference at the Telephonic 5 Discovery and Status Conference, which is currently set for August 20, 2018. If all parties 6 believe that scheduling a settlement conference earlier would be beneficial, they may request a 7 settlement conference by contacting Sujean Park (spark@caed.uscourts.gov) or Michelle 8 Rooney (mrooney@caed.uscourts.gov). 9 10 11 12 The case shall proceed according to the schedule issued February 2, 2018. (ECF No. 29) Accordingly, based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for settlement conference rescheduling is DENIED without prejudice. 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 16, 2018 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?