Clark v. Sherman
Filing
13
ORDER Denying 12 Motion for Reconsideration as Untimely, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/21/16. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
PAUL CLARK,
Petitioner,
10
13
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION AS UNTIMELY
v.
11
12
No. 1:16-cv-01550-LJO-SKO HC
STUART SHERMAN, Warden, Corcoran
State Prison,
(Doc. 12)
Respondent.
14
15
Petitioner, Paul Clark, a state prisoner represented by attorney Vicken H. Hagopian,
16
17
18
19
20
proceeds with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, filed October 12,
2016. On October 14, 2016, Petitioner filed a motion for temporary restraining order. The Court
referred the matter to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302
and 304.
On October 19, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and a recommendation that the
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Court dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction and, in the absence of jurisdiction, deny the
motion for temporary restraining order. The findings and recommendations, which were served
on both parties on the same date, provided that objections could be served within ten days and
replies within five days after the filing of any objections. On October 20, 2016, Petitioner filed
(1) objections to the finding and recommendation (Doc. 11) and (2) a motion for reconsideration
(Doc. 12) regarding his motion for a temporary restraining order.
///
1
1
In federal district court, motions for reconsideration are evaluated under F.R.Civ.P 59(e)
2
or 60(a) or (b). In either case, the party must be seeking relief from a final judgment, order, or
3
proceeding. In this case, the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations are pending, and
4
there is no final judgment, order, or proceeding.
Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration is hereby DENIED.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 21, 2016
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?