Baston v. Yett, et al.

Filing 36

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS That Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Be Denied 18 , 31 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/22/2017. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ELGAN BASTON, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. EDWARD M. YETT, et al., Case No. 1:16-cv-01564-LJO-EPG ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS BE DENIED (ECF Nos. 18, 31) Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Elgan Baston (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 5, 2017, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations, recommending that Defendants Benjamin Arreguin, Kristofer R. Campbell, Eddie Ohaya, Michael A. Toscano, and Edward M. Yett’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, (ECF No. 18), be denied. (ECF No. 31.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants did not file objections, and Plaintiff filed a notice indicating that he had no objections. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a de novo review of the matter. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds that the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations entered on December 5, 2017 (ECF No. 31) are adopted in full; 3 4 2. Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss (ECF No. 18) is denied; and 5 3. Defendants are directed to file an appropriate responsive pleading in accordance with Rule 12(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ December 22, 2017 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?