Wahl v. Sutton

Filing 61

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 60 Motion for Record on Appeal signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/25/2019. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

PETER GERARD WAHL,

10

Plaintiff,

11

Case No. 1:16-cv-01576-LJO-BAM (PC)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RECORD ON APPEAL

v.
(ECF No. 60)

12

SUTTON,

13

Defendant.

14
15

On October 21, 2019, Plaintiff Peter Gerard Wahl, a former state prisoner who was

16

proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, filed a motion seeking a

17

complete copy of the record on appeal. (ECF No. 60.)

18

Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit Rules, Plaintiff, as a pro se litigant, is not required to file an

19

excerpt of the record. Circuit Rule 30-1.2. Further, to the extent Plaintiff is attempting to order a

20

transcript, this request is unnecessary. Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(1). No proceedings in this action

21

were transcribed. Plaintiff’s motion is therefore DENIED. 1

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Barbara

Dated: October 25, 2019

A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28

1

Plaintiff is not prevented from requesting copies of the excerpts of the record pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 30-3.

1