Milan-Rodriguez v. Lynch

Filing 21

ORDER TERMINATING AS MOOT 13 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss; ORDER TO RESPOND to First Amended Petition Within Sixty (60) Days; and ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/22/2017. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
JORGE ANTONIO MILAN-RODRIGUEZ,

9

Case No. 1:16-cv-01578-SAB-HC

Petitioner,

10

ORDER TERMINATING AS MOOT
MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 13)

v.

11

ORDER TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED PETITION

LORETTA E. LYNCH,

12

Respondent.

13

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
14
Petitioner, a federal immigration detainee proceeding pro se, has filed a First Amended

15

16 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“FAP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
The Court has conducted a preliminary review of the FAP, wherein Petitioner challenges

17

18 his prolonged detention, the constitutional adequacy of his bond hearing, and his transfer to the
19 Pine Prairie Correctional Center in Louisiana, where Petitioner is currently detained. It is not
20 clear from the face of the FAP whether Petitioner is entitled to relief. 28 U.S.C. § 2243.
Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases,1 the Court

21

22 HEREBY ORDERS:
1.

23

TERMINATED as MOOT in light of the filing of the FAP.

24
2.

25

28

Within SIXTY (60) days of the date of service of this order, Respondent SHALL
FILE a RESPONSE to the FAP. See Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254

26
27

Respondent’s motion to dismiss the original petition (ECF No. 13) is

1

The Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases apply to § 2241 habeas petitions. See Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing
Section 2254 Cases (“The district court may apply any or all of these rules to a habeas corpus petition not covered
by” 28 U.S.C. § 2254.).

1

1

Cases; Cluchette v. Rushen, 770 F.2d 1469, 1473-74 (9th Cir. 1985) (court has

2

discretion to fix time for filing a response). A Response can be made by filing one

3

of the following:

4

A.

5

Respondent that Petitioner has procedurally defaulted a claim SHALL BE

6

MADE in the ANSWER, but must also address the merits of the claim

7

asserted.

8

B.
3.

9

AN ANSWER addressing the merits of the FAP. Any argument by

A MOTION TO DISMISS the FAP.

Within SIXTY (60) days of the date of service of this order, Respondent SHALL

10

FILE any and all transcripts or other documents necessary for the resolution of the

11

issues presented in the FAP. See Rule 5(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.
4.

12

If Respondent files an Answer to the FAP, Petitioner MAY FILE a Traverse

13

within THIRTY (30) days of the date Respondent’s Answer is filed with the

14

Court. If no Traverse is filed, the FAP and Answer are deemed submitted at the

15

expiration of the thirty days.
5.

16

If Respondent files a Motion to Dismiss, Petitioner SHALL FILE an Opposition

17

or Statement of Non-Opposition within TWENTY-ONE (21) days of the date

18

Respondent’s Motion is filed with the Court. Any Reply to an Opposition to the

19

Motion to Dismiss SHALL be filed within SEVEN (7) days after the opposition

20

is served. The Motion to Dismiss will be deemed submitted TWENTY-EIGHT

21

(28) days after the service of the Motion or when the Reply is filed, whichever

22

comes first. See Local Rule 230(l).

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25 Dated:

February 22, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

2