Milan-Rodriguez v. Lynch
Filing
30
ORDER for Respondent to SHOW CAUSE Why Motion to Dismiss Should Not Be Denied for Failure to Obey Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/5/17: Show Cause Response due by 9/8/2017. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JORGE ANTONIO MILAN-RODRIGUEZ,
Petitioner,
12
v.
13
14
Case No. 1:16-cv-01578-SAB-HC
ORDER FOR RESPONDENT TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY MOTION TO DISMISS
SHOULD NOT BE DENIED FOR FAILURE
TO OBEY COURT ORDER
LORETTA E. LYNCH,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner is a federal immigration detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of
18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
19
On August 4, 2017, this Court ordered that within twenty-one days of the date of service
20 of the order, Respondent was to file a supplemental brief regarding Petitioner’s claims for relief
21 arising out of his transfer to Louisiana and to submit any necessary evidence for resolution of the
22 issues. (ECF No. 29). To date, Respondent has not submitted a supplemental brief.
23
Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these
24 Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all
25 sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that no later than September 8, 2017,
1
2 Respondent shall show cause why Respondent’s motion to dismiss should not be denied for
3 failure to obey the Court’s order.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 Dated:
September 5, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?