Williams v. Bell et al

Filing 27

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Ruling on Defendants' Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant 26 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/27/17. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 C. BELL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DECLARE PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT [ECF No. 26] U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for expedited ruling on Defendants’ motion to 19 20 Case No.: 1:16-cv-01584-AWI-SAB (PC) Plaintiff John Wesley Williams is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) declare Plaintiff a vexatious litigant, filed October 26, 2017. Plaintiff’s motion must be denied. 21 Defendants filed their motion to declare Plaintiff a vexatious litigant on September 18, 2017, 22 and Plaintiff filed an opposition on October 26, 2017, the same day he filed the instant motion for 23 expedited ruling. Plaintiff is advised that pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Defendants have seven days 24 after the filing of an opposition to file a reply after which time the motion is deemed submitted for 25 review. Plaintiff is further advised that the Court reviews and issues rulings on motions in which they 26 are filed and strives to avoid delays whenever possible. However, there are hundreds of prisoner civil 27 rights cases presently pending before the Court, and delays are inevitable despite the Court’s best 28 /// 1 1 efforts. The Court is aware of the pendency of this case and will issue a ruling on Defendants’ motion 2 after it is submitted for review and in due course. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 October 27, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?