Williams v. Bell et al

Filing 76

ORDER ADOPTING 73 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING 71 Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/7/2019. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

C. BELL, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 1:16-cv-01584-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
[ECF Nos. 71, 73]

17

Plaintiff John Wesley Williams is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

19

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On January 29, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation

20
21

recommending that Plaintiff’s request for preliminary injunction be denied.

The Findings and

22

Recommendation was served on the parties and contained notice that objections were to be filed

23

within thirty days. Plaintiff filed objections on February 6, 2019.

24

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

25

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections,

26

the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper

27

analysis.

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendation, filed on January 29, 2019, is adopted in full; and

3

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is denied.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

February 7, 2019

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2