Williams v. Bell et al

Filing 76

ORDER ADOPTING 73 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER DENYING 71 Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/7/2019. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 C. BELL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:16-cv-01584-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF [ECF Nos. 71, 73] 17 Plaintiff John Wesley Williams is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 29, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation 20 21 recommending that Plaintiff’s request for preliminary injunction be denied. The Findings and 22 Recommendation was served on the parties and contained notice that objections were to be filed 23 within thirty days. Plaintiff filed objections on February 6, 2019. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de 25 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s objections, 26 the Court finds the Findings and Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed on January 29, 2019, is adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is denied. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ February 7, 2019 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?