Emberson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER AWARDING Plaintiff, Penny Esther Emberson, attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $4700.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/8/2017. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 PENNY ESTHER EMBERSON, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Case No.: 1:16-cv-01587-EPG STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 TO THE HONORABLE ERICA P. GROSJEAN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their undersigned 22 counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Penny Esther Emberson be awarded attorney 23 fees in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED dollars ($4700)) under the 24 Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation 25 for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil 26 action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). 27 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Penny Esther Emberson, the 28 government will consider the matter of Penny Esther Emberson's assignment of EAJA fees to -1- 1 Brian C. Shapiro. The retainer agreement containing the assignment is attached as exhibit 1. 2 Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment 3 will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States 4 Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the 5 government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. 6 Fees shall be made payable to Penny Esther Emberson, but if the Department of the 7 Treasury determines that Penny Esther Emberson does not owe a federal debt, then the 8 government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Law 9 Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment executed by Penny Esther 10 Emberson.1 Any payments made shall be delivered to Brian C. Shapiro. 11 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Penny Esther Emberson's request 12 for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant 13 under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release 14 from, and bar to, any and all claims that Penny Esther Emberson and/or Brian C. Shapiro 15 including Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in 16 connection with this action. 17 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Brian C. Shapiro and/or the Law Offices 18 of Lawrence D. Rohlfing to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), 19 subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA. 20 DATE: December 7, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 21 22 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING 23 /s/ Brian C. Shapiro 24 25 BY: __________________ 26 Brian C. Shapiro 27 1 28 The parties do not stipulate whether counsel for the plaintiff has a cognizable lien under federal law against the recovery of EAJA fees that survives the Treasury Offset Program. -2- 1 Attorney for plaintiff Penny Esther Emberson 2 3 4 DATED: December 7, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 5 6 7 /s/ Daniel P. Talbert 8 9 DANIEL P. TALBERT 10 Special Assistant United States Attorney 11 Attorneys for Defendant NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting 12 Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization) 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- 1 2 ORDER Based upon the stipulation of the parties, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Penny Esther 3 Emberson be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $4700.00 as authorized by 28 4 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 8, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- PROOF OF SERVICE 1 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 3 I am employed in the county of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 4 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite 5 C-115, Santa Fe Springs, California 90670. 6 On this day of December 8, 2017, I served the foregoing document described as 7 STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND 8 EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 9 AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 on the interested parties in this action by 10 placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows: 11 12 Ms. Penny Esther Emberson 13 18533 Norwalk Drive 14 Madera, CA 93638 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 I caused such envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the United States mail at Santa Fe Springs, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of this court at whose direction the service was made. 22 ___ 23 Brian C. Shapiro 24 TYPE OR PRINT NAME 25 26 27 28 /s/ Brian C. Shapiro____________ SIGNATURE 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 FOR CASE NUMBER 1:16-CV-01587-EPG 3 4 5 6 7 I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court for this court by using the CM/ECF system on December 8, 2017. I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system, except the plaintiff served herewith by mail. 8 /s/ Brian C. Shapiro 9 _______________________________ 10 Brian C. Shapiro 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?