Hunt v. Matevousian et al

Filing 7

ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Notice Clarifying His Intent Within Fourteen (14) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/9/2016. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

MAURICE HUNT,

10
11
12
13

Plaintiff,
v.
ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:16-cv-01592-BAM (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
NOTICE CLARIFYING HIS INTENT
(ECF No. 6)
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

16

Plaintiff Maurice Hunt (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil

17

action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.

18

388, 91 S. Ct. 1999 (1971).

19

On November 7, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the instant action

20

(ECF No. 6). However, Plaintiff’s statements in his motion make his intentions unclear, as he

21

refers to the case number for the instant action, but at the same time refers to defendants in a

22

separate action that Plaintiff also voluntarily dismissed (Hunt v. Matevousian, Case No. 1:16-cv-

23

01560-LJO-BAM (ECF No. 7)).

24

Accordingly, the Court orders Plaintiff to clearly identify, by case number and

25

defendants, the federal court actions he intends to litigate or dismiss. Plaintiff shall provide his

26

response to the Court in writing within fourteen (14) days after service of this action. If Plaintiff

27
28
1

1

fails to comply with this order, the Court shall dismiss this action pursuant to Plaintiff’s request

2

for voluntary dismissal.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

November 9, 2016

6

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2