Keith Komarnicki v. LinkUs Enterprises, LLC et al

Filing 61

STIPULATION and ORDER to MODIFY PLAINTIFF'S CLASS CERTIFICATION DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Class certification discovery cut-off: 9/26/2018. Class certification motion filing: 11/20/2018. Class certification motion op position filing: 12/20/2018. Class certification motion reply filing: 1/21/2019. Class Certification Motion Hearing set for 2/19/2019, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. The Mid-Discovery Status Conference currently set for 1/17/2019, is CONTINUED to 4/23/2019, at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/22/2018. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
5 Carolyn Hunt Cottrell (SBN 166977) David C. Leimbach (SBN 265409) SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP 2000 Powell Street, Suite 1400 Emeryville, California 94608 Tel: (415) 421-7100 Fax: (415) 421-7105 ccottrell@schneiderwallace.com dleimbach@schneiderwallace.com 6 Additional Counsel on the following page 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the proposed Class 1 2 3 4 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 KEITH KOMARNICKI, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, v. LINKUS ENTERPRISES, LLC, LINKUS ENTERPRISES, INC., LINKUS CA, DISH NETWORK SERVICE CORPORATION, DISH NETWORK CALIFORNIA SERVICE CORPORATION, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Case No. 1:16-cv-01602-DAD-SKO JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY PLAINTIFF’S CLASS CERTIFICATION DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER (Doc. 60) Date Removed: October 21, 2016 Judge: Sheila K. Oberto 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO MODIFY PLAINTIFF’S CLASS CERTIFICATION DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER Komarnicki v. LinkUs Enterprises, LLC, et al.; Case No. 1:16-cv-01602-DAD-SKO 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen (pro hac vice) Camille Fundora (pro hac vice) BERGER & MONTAGUE, P.C. 1622 Locust Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 Tel: (215) 875-3000 Fax: (215) 875-4604 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the proposed Class 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 S. BRETT SUTTON 143107 brett@suttonhague.com JARED HAGUE 251517 jared@suttonhague.com JUSTIN VECCHIARELLI 298684 justin@suttonhague.com SUTTON HAGUE LAW CORPORATION 5200 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 203 Fresno, California 93704 Telephone: (559) 325-0500 Attorneys for Defendant LINKUS ENTERPRISES, LLC 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MARLENE S. MURACO, Bar No. 154240 NEDA N. DAL CIELO, Bar No. 161982 JOSE MACIAS, JR., Bar No. 265033 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 50 W. San Fernando, 15th Floor San Jose, CA 95113-2303 Telephone: 408.998.4150 Facsimile: 408.288.5686 Attorneys for Defendants DISH NETWORK SERVICE CORPORATION and DISH NETWORK CALIFORNIA SERVICE CORPORATION 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO MODIFY PLAINTIFF’S CLASS CERTIFICATION DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER Komarnicki v. LinkUs Enterprises, LLC, et al.; Case No. 1:16-cv-01602-DAD-SKO 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 143, this Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff Keith 2 Komarnicki (“Plaintiff”), Defendants LinkUs Enterprises, LLC (“LinkUs”), DISH Network L.L.C., 3 and Dish Network California Service Corporation (the latter two Defendants are referred to jointly as 4 “Dish Network,” LinkUs and Dish Network are referred to collectively as “Defendants”), based upon 5 the following facts: 6 7 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s case was removed to this Court on October 21, 2016, and Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint on April 19, 2017; 8 WHEREAS, Plaintiff served his written discovery requests to Defendant on April 14, 2017. 9 Multiple extensions for Defendants’ deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s written discovery were granted, 10 and Defendants were ultimately relieved of their obligation to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery until 11 LinkUs’s motion to stay was resolved; 12 WHEREAS, after extensive meet and confer efforts involving multiple telephone conferences 13 and numerous letters and emails, the Parties have executed a proposed Stipulated Protective Order and 14 Clawback Agreement, Defendants have begun production of documents that do not involve 15 electronically stored information (“ESI”), and the Parties anticipate that production of Defendants’ 16 electronically stored information will begin shortly; 17 18 WHEREAS, the Parties are currently engaged in additional meet and confer to finalize the scope and mechanics of the ESI productions; 19 WHEREAS, in addition to written discovery, the Parties will also require the taking of 20 depositions prior to Plaintiff’s class certification motion and after the Parties have reviewed written 21 discovery; 22 WHEREAS, this Court entered an amended scheduling order on January 22, 2018 (Doc. 57) 23 setting deadlines of June 26, 2018 for the completion of class certification discovery; August 27, 2018 24 for Plaintiff to file his motion for class certification; September 25, 2018 for Defendants to oppose the 25 motion for class certification; October 22, 2018 for Plaintiff to reply in support of the motion for class 26 certification; along with a hearing date for the motion for class certification of November 20, 2018 at 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION TO MODIFY PLAINTIFF’S CLASS CERTIFICATION DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER Komarnicki v. LinkUs Enterprises, LLC, et al.; Case No. 1:16-cv-01602-DAD-SKO 1 1 9:30 a.m. before U.S. District Judge Dale A. Drozd and a mid-discovery status conference on January 2 17, 2019 before U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation; 3 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that additional time is required to conduct class certification 4 discovery, and Plaintiff contends that the discovery outlined above will potentially conserve both the 5 Parties’ and the Court’s resources by crystalizing the scope of claims before engaging in class 6 certification briefing; 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 WHEREAS, this Stipulation is not entered for dilatory or any other improper purpose, and will not result in prejudice to any party if granted; NOW THEREFORE, based on the foregoing, the Parties hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The deadline for the completion of class certification discovery, currently set for June 26, 2018, is CONTINUED to September 26, 2018; 2. The deadline for Plaintiff to file his motion for class certification, currently set for August 27, 2018, is CONTINUED to November 20, 2018; 14 3. The deadline for Defendants to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s class certification 15 motion, if any, currently set for September 25, 2018, is CONTINUED TO December 16 20, 2018; 17 18 4. The deadline for Plaintiff’s reply in support of Plaintiff’s class certification motion, if any, currently set for October 22, 2018, is CONTINUED to January 21, 2019; 19 5. The hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for class certification, currently set November 20, 20 2018, is CONTINUED to February 19, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5 before the 21 Honorable Dale A. Drozd, U.S. District Judge. 22 IT IS SO STIPULATED 23 24 DATED: May 18, 2018 Respectfully Submitted, 25 /s/ Carolyn Hunt Cottrell Carolyn Hunt Cottrell (SBN 166977) SCHNEIDER WALLACE COTTRELL KONECKY WOTKYNS LLP 2000 Powell Street, Suite 1400 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION TO MODIFY PLAINTIFF’S CLASS CERTIFICATION DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER Komarnicki v. LinkUs Enterprises, LLC, et al.; Case No. 1:16-cv-01602-DAD-SKO 2 2 Emeryville, California 94608 Telephone: (415) 421-7100 Facsimile: (415) 421-7105 ccottrell@schneiderwallace.com 3 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the proposed Class 1 4 5 6 DATED: May 18, 2018 SUTTON HAGUE LAW CORPORATION, P.C. 7 By: 8 9 /s/ S. Brett Sutton S. BRETT SUTTON Attorneys for Defendants LINKUS ENTERPRISES, LLC 10 11 DATED: May 18, 2018 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 12 By: 13 14 15 16 /s/ Marlene S. Muraco MARLENE S. MURACO NEDA N. DAL CIELO JOSE MACIAS, JR. Attorneys for Defendants DISH NETWORK SERVICE CORPORATION AND DISH NETWORK CALIFORNIA SERVICE CORPORATION 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION TO MODIFY PLAINTIFF’S CLASS CERTIFICATION DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER Komarnicki v. LinkUs Enterprises, LLC, et al.; Case No. 1:16-cv-01602-DAD-SKO 3 ORDER 1 2 Based on the parties’ above-stipulation to modify the class certification briefing schedule (Doc. 3 60), and good cause appearing pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4), the Court hereby GRANTS the 4 stipulation and modifies its January 22, 2018 order (Doc. 57) as follows: 5 6 7 8 EVENT Class certification discovery cut-off Class certification motion filing Class certification motion opposition filing Class certification motion reply filing CURRENT DATE June 26, 2018 August 27, 2018 September 25, 2018 October 22, 2018 Class certification motion hearing November 20, 2018 9 10 11 NEW DATE September 26, 2018 November 20, 2018 December 20, 2018 January 21, 2019 February 19, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. (before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, U.S. District Judge, in Courtroom 5) 12 13 14 15 To allow the Court the opportunity to rule on Plaintiff’s class certification motion, the middiscovery status conference currently set for January 17, 2019, is hereby CONTINUED to April 23, 2019, at 10:15 A.M. in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 Dated: May 22, 2018 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION TO MODIFY PLAINTIFF’S CLASS CERTIFICATION DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER Komarnicki v. LinkUs Enterprises, LLC, et al.; Case No. 1:16-cv-01602-DAD-SKO 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?