Wonderly v. Youngblood et al

Filing 59

ORDER GRANTING 58 Stipulation to Amend Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/26/2017. Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures due by 10/2/2017. Pleading Amendment Deadline 11/3/2017. Stipulated Notice of Potential Opt-in Plaintiffs due by 10/6/2017. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 5 GREGORY G. PETERSEN, A LAW CORPORATION Gregory G. Petersen (SBN 77744) Robert M. Crissman (SBN 292299) 1700 East Garry Avenue, Ste. 101 Santa Ana, California 92705 greg@lawnet.com; robert@lawnet.com Telephone: (949) 864-2200 Facsimile: (949) 640-8983 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 10 11 DARREN WONDERLY, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, 12 Case No.: 1:16-CV-01621-JLT Doc. 58 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 SHERIFF DONNY YOUNGBLOOD AND DOES 1 through 50, Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 STIPULATION The parties to the above-captioned action, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby enter into the below stipulation with regard to the following facts and circumstances: WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel was out for two weeks having undergone two surgeries and just recently came back to work; WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order issued by the Court identified the date for initial 25 disclosures as September 8, 2018. Counsel have conferred and agreed that the date for Initial 26 Disclosures in the Scheduling Order had a typographical error and should have been 27 September 8, 2017. Plaintiff’s counsel had the exchange of initial disclosures calendared for 28 September 8, 2018, pursuant to the Scheduling Order. Defendant served his Initial Disclosures 1 STIPULATION AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 on September 8, 2017. Plaintiff has committed to serving his initial disclosures no later than 2 October 2, 2017. 3 IT IS STIPULATED THAT: 4 1. 5 Plaintiff shall have until October 2, 2017 to send his initial disclosures to Defendant’s counsel; 6 2. Pleading Amendment Deadline: Any requested pleading amendments are ordered 7 to be filed, either through a stipulation or motion to amend no later than November 8 3, 2017; and 9 3. Notice of Potential Opt-in Plaintiffs: The parties SHALL file a stipulated notice 10 form, no later than October 6, 2017. Following approval by the Court, notice 11 SHALL be given no later than October 20, 2017. Any individuals seeking to opt-in 12 to the action must complete and file the consent form no later than January 3, 2018. 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 14 15 Dated: September 25, 2017 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 16 17 By: s/ Nathan W. Austin Nathan W. Austin Evan D. Beecher Counsel for Defendant, Sheriff Donny Youngblood 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: September 25, 2017 GREGORY G. PETERSEN 23 24 25 26 By: s/ Gregory G. Petersen Gregory G. Petersen Robert M. Crissman Counsel for Plaintiff, Darren Wonderly 27 28 2 STIPULATION AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 ORDER 2 The Court, having considered the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause 3 otherwise appearing therefor, makes the following order: 4 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 5 4. Initial Disclosure for Plaintiff: Plaintiff shall exchange his initial disclosures to 6 Defendant no later than October 2, 2017; 7 5. Pleading Amendment Deadline: Any requested pleading amendments are 8 ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or motion to amend no later than 9 November 3, 2017; and 10 6. Notice of Potential Opt-in Plaintiffs: The parties SHALL file a stipulated notice 11 form, no later than October 6, 2017. Following approval by the Court, notice 12 SHALL be given no later than October 20, 2017. Any individuals seeking to opt13 in to the action must complete and file the consent form no later than January 3, 14 2018. 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 Dated: September 26, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?