Arnold v. City of Fresno

Filing 15

ORDER RE: Consent Decree for Settlement of Plaintiff's Injunctive Relief Claims Only, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/12/17. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

CONNIE ARNOLD,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.

15

CITY OF FRESNO, et al.,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Defendants.

) Case No.: 1:16-CV-01625-LJO-EPG
)
)
) ORDER RE: CONSENT DECREE FOR
) SETTLEMENT OF PLAINTIFF’S
) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF CLAIMS ONLY
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER RE: CONSENT DECREE FOR SETTLEMENT OF PLAINTIFF’S INJUNCTIVE RELIEF CLAIMS ONLY
Case No.: 1:16-CV-01625-LJO-EPG
1

1

ORDER ON CONSENT DECREE

2
3

Pursuant to the concurrently-filed Consent Decree for Settlement of Plaintiff’s

4
5
6
7

Injunctive Relief Claims Only, and for good cause shown, Defendant is ordered to
perform the remedial measures in accordance with the Consent Decree. If said
remedial measures are performed and completed in accordance with the time frames

8
9
10
11

set forth in the Consent Decree, which the Court finds to be a reasonable time frame
in light of the circumstances, there shall be a finding that the affected facilities are in
compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and the 2010 ADA Standards

12
13
14
15

for Accessible Design. Therefore, Court makes the following orders:
1. The concurrently-filed Consent Decree is hereby ordered.
2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action to enforce provisions of

16

the Consent Decree and Order.

17
18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

Dated:

June 12, 2017

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER RE: CONSENT DECREE FOR SETTLEMENT OF PLAINTIFF’S INJUNCTIVE RELIEF CLAIMS ONLY
Case No.: 1:16-CV-01625-LJO-EPG
2