Arnold v. City of Fresno

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER DISMISSING ACTION with Prejudice and Joint Request for Retention of Jurisdiction signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 07/10/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15

CONNIE ARNOLD,

16
17

Plaintiff,
vs.

18
19
20
21
22

CITY OF FRESNO, et al.,
Defendants.

) Case No.: 1:16-CV-01625-LJO-EPG
)
) Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill
)
) ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION
) DISMISSING ACTION WITH
) PREJUDICE AND JOINT REQUEST
) FOR RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
)
) Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
)
)

23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND JOINT REQUEST FOR
RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
Case No.: 1:16-CV-01625-LJO-EPG
1

1
2

Having considered the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Dismiss the Action With
Prejudice and Request for Retention of Jurisdiction, and good cause appearing

3
4
5
6

therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice
and this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for the limited purpose of
enforcing the terms of the previously-entered Consent Decree for Injunctive Relief

7
8

[Doc 15] and the Plaintiff’s settlement agreement with Defendant City of Fresno.

9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 10, 2017

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND JOINT REQUEST FOR
RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
Case No.: 1:16-CV-01625-LJO-EPG
2