Tofaute, et al v. County of Madera, et al

Filing 10

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff David Dixon's 8 Amended Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/4/17. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

Case No. 1:16-cv-01627-DAD-SKO

TIMOTHY S. TOFAUTE and DAVID
DIXON,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF DAVID
DIXON’S AMENDED APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiffs,

9
v.

10

(Doc. 8)

COUNTY OF MADERA, et al.,
11

Defendants.

/

12
ORDER

13

Plaintiffs Timothy S. Tofaute (“Tofaute”) and David Dixon (“Dixon”), pro se litigants,

14

15 filed a complaint on October 28, 2016, along with applications to proceed in forma pauperis
16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Docs. 1, 2 & 3.) On November 16, 2016, the Court ordered
17 Plaintiff Dixon to file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis that indicate the
18 amount he has received and is receiving in disability compensation. (Doc. 6.) Plaintiff Dixon
19 filed his amended application to proceed in forma pauperis on December 15, 2016. (Doc. 8.)
Plaintiff Dixon’s amended application demonstrates entitlement to proceed without

20

21 prepayment of fees. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Dixon’s application
22 to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25 Dated:
26
27
28

January 4, 2017

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

.