Tofaute, et al v. County of Madera, et al
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff David Dixon's 8 Amended Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/4/17. (Marrujo, C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 1:16-cv-01627-DAD-SKO
TIMOTHY S. TOFAUTE and DAVID
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF DAVID
DIXON’S AMENDED APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
COUNTY OF MADERA, et al.,
Plaintiffs Timothy S. Tofaute (“Tofaute”) and David Dixon (“Dixon”), pro se litigants,
15 filed a complaint on October 28, 2016, along with applications to proceed in forma pauperis
16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Docs. 1, 2 & 3.) On November 16, 2016, the Court ordered
17 Plaintiff Dixon to file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis that indicate the
18 amount he has received and is receiving in disability compensation. (Doc. 6.) Plaintiff Dixon
19 filed his amended application to proceed in forma pauperis on December 15, 2016. (Doc. 8.)
Plaintiff Dixon’s amended application demonstrates entitlement to proceed without
21 prepayment of fees. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Dixon’s application
22 to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 4, 2017
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?