Tofaute, et al v. County of Madera, et al

Filing 10

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff David Dixon's 8 Amended Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/4/17. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 Case No. 1:16-cv-01627-DAD-SKO TIMOTHY S. TOFAUTE and DAVID DIXON, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF DAVID DIXON’S AMENDED APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiffs, 9 v. 10 (Doc. 8) COUNTY OF MADERA, et al., 11 Defendants. / 12 ORDER 13 Plaintiffs Timothy S. Tofaute (“Tofaute”) and David Dixon (“Dixon”), pro se litigants, 14 15 filed a complaint on October 28, 2016, along with applications to proceed in forma pauperis 16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Docs. 1, 2 & 3.) On November 16, 2016, the Court ordered 17 Plaintiff Dixon to file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis that indicate the 18 amount he has received and is receiving in disability compensation. (Doc. 6.) Plaintiff Dixon 19 filed his amended application to proceed in forma pauperis on December 15, 2016. (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff Dixon’s amended application demonstrates entitlement to proceed without 20 21 prepayment of fees. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Dixon’s application 22 to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: 26 27 28 January 4, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?