Tofaute, et al v. County of Madera, et al

Filing 11

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Timothy S. Tofaute's 9 Amended Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/4/17. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

Case No. 1:16-cv-01627-DAD-SKO

TIMOTHY S. TOFAUTE and DAVID
DIXON,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
TIMOTHY S. TOFAUTE’S AMENDED
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiffs,

9
v.

10

COUNTY OF MADERA, et al.,
11

Defendants.

/

(Doc. 9)

12
ORDER

13

Plaintiffs Timothy S. Tofaute (“Tofaute”) and David Dixon (“Dixon”), pro se litigants,

14

15 filed a complaint on October 28, 2016, along with applications to proceed in forma pauperis
16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Docs. 1, 2 & 3.) On November 16, 2016, the Court ordered
17 Plaintiff Tofaute to file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis that indicate the
18 amount he has received and is receiving in disability compensation. (Doc. 6.) Plaintiff Tofaute
19 filed his amended application to proceed in forma pauperis on December 15, 2016. (Doc. 9.)
Plaintiff Tofaute’s amended application demonstrates entitlement to proceed without

20

21 prepayment of fees. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Tofaute’s application
22 to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25 Dated:
26
27
28

January 4, 2017

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

.