Ashely v. Youngblood et al
Filing
57
ORDER GRANTING 56 Stipulation to Amend Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/26/2017. Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures due by 10/2/2017. Pleading Amendment Deadline 11/3/2017. Stipulated Notice of Potential Opt-in Plaintiffs due by 10/6/2017. (Hall, S)
1
5
GREGORY G. PETERSEN,
A LAW CORPORATION
Gregory G. Petersen (SBN 77744)
Robert M. Crissman (SBN 292299)
1700 East Garry Avenue, Ste. 101
Santa Ana, California 92705
greg@lawnet.com; robert@lawnet.com
Telephone: (949) 864-2200
Facsimile: (949) 640-8983
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
10
11
MARK ASHLEY, individually and on behalf
of those similarly situated,
12
Case No.: 1:16-CV-01638-JLT
Doc. 56
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
16
SHERIFF DONNY YOUNGBLOOD AND
DOES 1 through 50,
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
STIPULATION
The parties to the above-captioned action, by and through their attorneys of record,
hereby enter into the below stipulation with regard to the following facts and circumstances:
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel was out for two weeks having undergone two surgeries
and just recently came back to work;
WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order issued by the Court identified the date for initial
25
disclosures as September 8, 2018. Counsel have conferred and agreed that the date for Initial
26
Disclosures in the Scheduling Order had a typographical error and should have been
27
September 8, 2017. Plaintiff’s counsel had the exchange of initial disclosures calendared for
28
September 8, 2018, pursuant to the Scheduling Order. Defendant served his Initial Disclosures
1
STIPULATION AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
on September 8, 2017. Plaintiff has committed to serving his initial disclosures no later than
2
October 2, 2017.
3
IT IS STIPULATED THAT:
4
1.
5
Plaintiff shall have until October 2, 2017 to send his initial disclosures to
Defendant’s counsel;
6
2. Pleading Amendment Deadline: Any requested pleading amendments are ordered
7
to be filed, either through a stipulation or motion to amend no later than November
8
3, 2017; and
9
3. Notice of Potential Opt-in Plaintiffs: The parties SHALL file a stipulated notice
10
form, no later than October 6, 2017. Following approval by the Court, notice
11
SHALL be given no later than October 20, 2017. Any individuals seeking to opt-in
12
to the action must complete and file the consent form no later than January 3, 2018.
13
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
14
15
Dated: September 25, 2017
JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
16
17
By: s/ Nathan W. Austin
Nathan W. Austin
Evan D. Beecher
Counsel for Defendant,
Sheriff Donny Youngblood
18
19
20
21
22
Dated: September 25, 2017
GREGORY G. PETERSEN
23
24
25
26
By: s/ Gregory G. Petersen
Gregory G. Petersen
Robert M. Crissman
Counsel for Plaintiff, Mark Ashley
27
28
2
STIPULATION AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
ORDER
2
The Court, having considered the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause
3
otherwise appearing therefor, makes the following order:
4
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
5
4. Initial Disclosure for Plaintiff: Plaintiff shall exchange his initial disclosures to
6
Defendant no later than October 2, 2017;
7
5. Pleading Amendment Deadline: Any requested pleading amendments are
8
ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or motion to amend no later than
9
November 3, 2017; and
10
6. Notice of Potential Opt-in Plaintiffs: The parties SHALL file a stipulated notice
11
form, no later than October 6, 2017. Following approval by the Court, notice
12
SHALL be given no later than October 20, 2017. Any individuals seeking to opt13
in to the action must complete and file the consent form no later than January 3,
14
2018.
15
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
September 26, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?