Verragio, Ltd. v. Malakan Diamond Co.

Filing 28

ORDER APPROVING Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Crossclaim Between Malakan Diamond Co. and Jensen Jewelers of Idaho, LLC. Cross-defendant Jensen Jewelers of Idaho, LLC's response to Crossclaimant Malakan Diamond Co.'s crossclaims shall be filed no later than March 20, 2017. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/1/2017. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VERROGIO, LTD., Case No. 1:16-cv-01647-DAD-SKO 12 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO CROSSCLAIM BETWEEN MALAKAN DIAMOND CO. AND JENSEN JEWELERS OF IDAHO, LLC. Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. MALAKAN DIAMOND CO., 15 Defendant. (Doc. 21) 16 ______________________________________ 17 MALAKAN DIAMOND CO., 18 Counterclaimant/Crossclaimant, 19 vs. 20 VERROGIO, LTD.; AE JEWELERS, INC.; AE 21 JEWELERS OF APPLETON, LLC.; HAROLD 22 JAFFE JEWELRY, INC.; JENSEN JEWELERS OF IDAHO, LLC; and DOES 1 to 23 10, inclusive, 24 25 Counterclaim and Crossclaim Defendants. 26 / / / 27 28 -1- ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO CROSSCLAIM BETWEEN MALAKAN DIAMOND CO. AND JENSEN JEWELERS OF IDAHO, LLC. 1 Based on the “Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Crossclaim” between 2 Crossclaimant Malakan Diamond Co. and Cross-defendant Jensen Jewelers of Idaho, LLC filed on 3 February 24, 2017 (Doc. 21), it is ORDERED that Cross-defendant Jensen Jewelers of Idaho, 4 LLC’s response to Crossclaimant Malakan Diamond Co.’s crossclaims shall be filed no later than 5 March 20, 2017. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: 9 March 1, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO CROSSCLAIM BETWEEN MALAKAN DIAMOND CO. AND JENSEN JEWELERS OF IDAHO, LLC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?