Verragio, Ltd. v. Malakan Diamond Co.

Filing 30

ORDER APPROVING Stipulation to Continue Mandatory Scheduling Conference. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 4/7/2017, is CONTINUED to 4/27/2017, at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties shall file their joint scheduling report by no later than 4/20/2017. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/2/2017. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VERROGIO, LTD., Case No. 1:16-cv-01647-DAD-SKO 12 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. (Doc. 29) MALAKAN DIAMOND CO., 15 Defendant. 16 ______________________________________ 17 MALAKAN DIAMOND CO., 18 Counterclaimant/Crossclaimant, 19 vs. 20 VERROGIO, LTD.; AE JEWELERS, INC.; AE 21 JEWELERS OF APPLETON, LLC.; HAROLD 22 JAFFE JEWELRY, INC.; JENSEN JEWELERS OF IDAHO, LLC; and DOES 1 to 23 10, inclusive, 24 Counterclaim and Crossclaim 25 Defendants. 26 27 /// 28 -1- ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1 Upon consideration of the Stipulation to Continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, 2 which Stipulation is between Plaintiff VERRAGIO, LTD. and Defendant MALAKAN 3 DIAMOND CO. (Doc. 29), and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the parties’ request to 4 continue the Scheduling Conference currently set for April 7, 2017. 5 Accordingly, the Court CONTINUES the Scheduling Conference to April 27, 2017, at 6 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties 7 shall file their Joint Scheduling Report by no later than April 20, 2017. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: 11 March 2, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?