Verragio, Ltd. v. Malakan Diamond Co.
Filing
32
ORDER APPROVING Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Crossclaim Between Malakan Diamond Co. and Harold Jaffee Jewelry, Inc. Cross-defendant Harold Jaffe Jewelry, Inc.'s response to Crossclaimant Malakan Diamond Co.'s crossclaims shall be filed no later than April 3, 2017. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/21/2017. (Timken, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 VERROGIO, LTD.,
Case No. 1:16-cv-01647-DAD-SKO
12
ORDER APPROVING SECOND
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO CROSSCLAIM BETWEEN
MALAKAN DIAMOND CO. AND HAROLD
JAFFE JEWELRY, INC.
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
MALAKAN DIAMOND CO.,
15
Defendant.
16 ______________________________________ (Doc. 31)
17 MALAKAN DIAMOND CO.,
18
Counterclaimant/Crossclaimant,
19
vs.
20
VERROGIO, LTD.; AE JEWELERS, INC.; AE
21 JEWELERS OF APPLETON, LLC.; HAROLD
22 JAFFE JEWELRY, INC.; JENSEN
JEWELERS OF IDAHO, LLC; and DOES 1 to
23 10, inclusive,
24
25
Counterclaim and Crossclaim
Defendants.
26 / / /
27
28
-1-
ORDER APPROVING SECOND
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO CROSSCLAIM BETWEEN
MALAKAN DIAMOND CO. AND HAROLD
JAFFE JEWELRY, INC.
1
Based on the “Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Crossclaim” between
2 Crossclaimant Malakan Diamond Co. and Cross-defendant Harold Jaffe Jewelry, Inc. filed on
3 March 17, 2017 (Doc. 31), and for good cause shown, it is ORDERED that Cross-defendant
4 Harold Jaffe Jewelry, Inc.’s response to Crossclaimant Malakan Diamond Co.’s crossclaims shall
5 be filed no later than April 3, 2017.
6
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 Dated:
9
March 21, 2017
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
ORDER APPROVING SECOND
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO CROSSCLAIM BETWEEN
MALAKAN DIAMOND CO. AND HAROLD
JAFFE JEWELRY, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?