Verragio, Ltd. v. Malakan Diamond Co.

Filing 9

ORDER Approving Stipulation (Doc. 8) to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint: that Defendant has up to and including January 6, 2017 to respond to Plaintiffs initial Complaint. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/3/2017. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 VERRAGIO, LTD.,

Case No. 1:16-cv-01647-DAD-BAM

12

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
COMPLAINT

Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.
MALAKAN DIAMOND CO.,

15

Defendant.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///

27
28
-1-

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
COMPLAINT

1

Upon consideration of the Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint,

2 which Stipulation is between Plaintiff MALAKAN DIAMOND CO. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff
3 VERRAGIO, LTD (“Plaintiff”), and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that
4 Defendant has up to and including January 6, 2017 to respond to Plaintiff’s initial Complaint.
5
6
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated:

January 3, 2017

/s/ Barbara

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE