Verragio, Ltd. v. Malakan Diamond Co.
Filing
9
ORDER Approving Stipulation (Doc. 8) to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint: that Defendant has up to and including January 6, 2017 to respond to Plaintiffs initial Complaint. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/3/2017. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 VERRAGIO, LTD.,
Case No. 1:16-cv-01647-DAD-BAM
12
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
MALAKAN DIAMOND CO.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
27
28
-1-
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
COMPLAINT
1
Upon consideration of the Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint,
2 which Stipulation is between Plaintiff MALAKAN DIAMOND CO. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff
3 VERRAGIO, LTD (“Plaintiff”), and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that
4 Defendant has up to and including January 6, 2017 to respond to Plaintiff’s initial Complaint.
5
6
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
January 3, 2017
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?