Martinez v. Davey
Filing
62
ORDER ADOPTING 56 Findings and Recommendations to Dismiss Non-Cognizable Claims, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/20/2020. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICARDO MARTINEZ,
12
13
14
15
CASE No. 1:16-cv-1658-AWI-JLT (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS
NON-COGNIZABLE CLAIMS
v.
D. DAVEY, et al.,
(Doc. 56)
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42
19
U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
20
§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On February 7, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
22
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
23
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to
24
the findings and recommendations.
25
26
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported
by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
27
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
28
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 7, 2020 (Doc. 56), are adopted in full;
1
1
2
2. This action shall proceed on an Eighth Amendment medical indifference claim against
defendants Dr. J. Lewis and Warden D. Davey.
3
3. All other claims and defendants are hereby dismissed.
4
4. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 20, 2020
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?