United States of America v. Ingram
Filing
4
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE RE: Tax Summons Enforecement signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/07/2016. Show Cause Hearing set for 2/22/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
1:16-cv-01663-AWI-SAB
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: TAX SUMMONS
ENFORCEMENT
v.
JAMES W. INGRAM,
15
Respondent.
Date: Wednesday, February 22, 2017
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Courtoom 9, 6th Floor
Judge: Honorable Stanley A. Boone
16
17
18
Upon the petition of Phillip A. Talbert, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of
19 California, including the verification of Revenue Officer Danielle Moser, and the Exhibits attached
20 thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
21
1.
Respondent James W. Ingram shall appear before United States Magistrate Judge Stanley
22
A. Boone, at the United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare St., Fresno, California,
23
Courtroom 9, on Wednesday, February 22, 2017, to show cause why Respondent
24
should not be compelled to obey the IRS summons issued on January 27, 2016.
25
2.
26
27
28
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(1), the Court hereby appoints the investigating IRS employee,
and all federal employees designated by that employee, to serve process in this case.
3.
To afford the respondent an opportunity to respond to the petition and the petitioner an
opportunity to reply, a copy of this order, the Petition and its Exhibits, and the Points and
1
30
1
Authorities, shall be served by delivering a copy to the respondent personally, or by
2
leaving a copy at the respondent’s dwelling house or usual place of abode with some
3
person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein, or by any other means of
4
service permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e), at least 30 days before the show cause hearing
5
date including any continued date, unless such service cannot be made despite reasonable
6
efforts.
7
4.
8
9
Proof of any service done under paragraph 3, above, shall be filed with the Clerk on or
before January 8, 2017.
5.
If the federal employee assigned to serve these documents is not reasonably able to serve
10
the papers as provided in paragraph 3, petitioner may request a court order granting leave
11
to serve by other means. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(a)(5). The request shall detail the efforts
12
made to serve the respondent.
13
6.
The file reflects a prima facie showing that the investigation is conducted pursuant to a
14
legitimate purpose, that the inquiry may be relevant to that purpose, that the information
15
sought is not already within the Commissioner’s possession, and that the administrative
16
steps required by the Code have been followed. See United States v. Powell, 379 U.S.
17
48, 57-58 (1964). The burden of coming forward therefore has shifted to whoever might
18
oppose enforcement.
19
7.
Respondent shall file and serve any defense or opposition to the Petition to Enforce the
20
IRS Summons at least ten (10) days before the show cause hearing date including any
21
continued date.
22
8.
At the show cause hearing, the Magistrate Judge intends to consider the issues properly
23
raised in opposition to enforcement. Only those issues brought into controversy by the
24
responsive pleadings and supported by affidavit will be considered. Any uncontested
25
allegation in the petition will be considered admitted.
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
2
30
1
9.
If Respondent has no objections to enforcement of the summons, he may file and serve a
2
statement of non-opposition to the Petition at least ten (10) days prior to the show hearing
3
date including any continued date. Respondent’s appearance at the hearing will then be
4
excused.
5
6 IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 Dated:
8
November 7, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
30
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?