Walker v. King et al

Filing 140

ORDER re Plaintiff's 138 Motion Requesting Information; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk to Send Plaintiff Copy of 101 Order Following Telephonic Discovery and Status Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/13/2020. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

ROGER WALKER,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

Case No. 1:16-cv-01665-AWI-EPG (PC)
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
REQUESTING INFORMATION

v.
(ECF NO. 138)
TIM POOLE, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND
PLAINTIFF COPY OF ORDER FOLLOWING
TELEPHONIC DISCOVERY AND STATUS
CONFERENCE (ECF NO. 101)

16
On July 10, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting information. (ECF No. 138).

17
18

Plaintiff states that he notified the unit supervisor about the telephonic conference that was

19

scheduled for July 1, 2020, but that the unit supervisor told him no conference was scheduled for

20

that date. However, it was documented by a court order that a conference was scheduled for this

21

date. Plaintiff asks to be notified of any changes to the Court’s order.
Plaintiff is correct that the Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing was originally

22
23

scheduled for July 1, 2020. However, on August 14, 2019, the conference was continued to

24

September 30, 2020. (ECF No. 101, p. 2). Thus, there was no conference in this case for

25

Plaintiff to attend on July 1, 2020. In an abundance of caution, the Court will direct the Clerk of

26

Court to send Plaintiff a copy of the Order Following Telephonic Discovery and Status

27

Conference, which continued the Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing.

28

\\\
1

1
2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy
of the Order Following Telephonic Discovery and Status Conference (ECF No. 101).

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 13, 2020

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2