Gaines v. Brown et al
Filing
41
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 40 Motion for Court to Reissue March 9, 2018 Order Finding Service of First Amended Complaint; ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Send March 9, 2018 Order to Plaintiff signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 08/27/2018. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARY LEE GAINES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
Case No. 1:16-cv-01666-LJO-BAM (PC)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR COURT TO REISSUE MARCH 9, 2018
ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
BROWN, et al.,
15
16
17
18
19
(ECF No. 40)
Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
SEND MARCH 9, 2018 ORDER TO
PLAINTIFF
THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Mary Lee Gaines (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
20
pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on
21
Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Mirelez and Hoehing for deliberate
22
indifference to medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
23
On March 9, 2018, the undersigned issued an order finding service of the first amended
24
complaint appropriate and forwarding service documents to Plaintiff for completion and return
25
within thirty days. (ECF No. 30.) The Court has extended the deadline for Plaintiff to file the
26
appropriate service documents four times. (ECF Nos. 34, 35, 37, 39.) In the Court’s most recent
27
order denying Plaintiff’s motion for a stay and granting a further extension of time, Plaintiff was
28
explicitly warned that further extensions of time would not be granted without a showing of good
1
1
cause, and Plaintiff should specifically identify the reasons for her failure to timely file completed
2
service documents or to comply with the Court’s order. (ECF No. 39.)
3
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, filed August 24, 2018, requesting that the
4
Court reissue the March 9, 2018 order finding service of the first amended complaint appropriate.
5
(ECF No. 40.) Plaintiff states that she suffers from many physical and mental illnesses and
6
complications, which may sometimes interfere with her court filings. Plaintiff further states that
7
she may have either misplaced, lost, or never received the Court’s March 9, 2018 order. As she
8
cannot locate the Court’s order in any of her legal documents, Plaintiff requests reissuance of the
9
order and service documents for completion. (Id.) The Court assumes that Plaintiff also seeks an
10
extension of the deadline for submission of the service documents to the Court, which were due
11
on or before August 21, 2018.
Generally, the Clerk’s Office will provide copies for Plaintiff at a cost of $0.50 per page.
12
13
Under the circumstances, the Court will make a one-time exception and will direct the Clerk’s
14
Office to provide a copy of the pending findings and recommendations to Plaintiff at no charge.
15
However, Plaintiff is advised that any further copies will need to be paid for by Plaintiff, and that
16
it is her responsibility to maintain copies of all orders received from the Court.
17
With respect to extending the deadline for submission of service documents, the Court
18
notes that, in her prior three motions seeking extensions or a stay of this action, Plaintiff has never
19
claimed that she was unable to locate a copy of the Court’s order or the service documents to be
20
completed. Rather, Plaintiff has argued that she did not have adequate access to the law library,
21
and that she suffers from various mental and physical ailments that limit her ability to litigate this
22
action. (See ECF Nos. 33, 36, 38.)
23
The Court has been awaiting completion of these service documents, a task that does not
24
require legal research to complete, for more than five months. As noted above, the deadline has
25
already been extended four times. Plaintiff will be provided with one final opportunity to file her
26
completed service documents. Future requests for extension of time regarding this deadline
27
will be subject to a narrow interpretation of what constitutes good cause.
28
///
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s motion for reissuance of the Court’s March 9, 2018 order, (ECF No. 40), is
GRANTED;
2. The Clerk’s Office shall mail a copy of the March 9, 2018 order, (ECF No. 30), including
all attachments and service documents for completion, to Plaintiff;
3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall submit
7
completed service documents for Defendants Mirelez and Hoehing, as discussed in the
8
Court’s March 9, 2018 order; and
9
10
4. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action for
failure to obey court orders and failure to prosecute.
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
August 27, 2018
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?