Gaines v. Brown et al

Filing 41

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 40 Motion for Court to Reissue March 9, 2018 Order Finding Service of First Amended Complaint; ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Send March 9, 2018 Order to Plaintiff signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 08/27/2018. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARY LEE GAINES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 Case No. 1:16-cv-01666-LJO-BAM (PC) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COURT TO REISSUE MARCH 9, 2018 ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BROWN, et al., 15 16 17 18 19 (ECF No. 40) Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO SEND MARCH 9, 2018 ORDER TO PLAINTIFF THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE Plaintiff Mary Lee Gaines (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 20 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 21 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Mirelez and Hoehing for deliberate 22 indifference to medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 23 On March 9, 2018, the undersigned issued an order finding service of the first amended 24 complaint appropriate and forwarding service documents to Plaintiff for completion and return 25 within thirty days. (ECF No. 30.) The Court has extended the deadline for Plaintiff to file the 26 appropriate service documents four times. (ECF Nos. 34, 35, 37, 39.) In the Court’s most recent 27 order denying Plaintiff’s motion for a stay and granting a further extension of time, Plaintiff was 28 explicitly warned that further extensions of time would not be granted without a showing of good 1 1 cause, and Plaintiff should specifically identify the reasons for her failure to timely file completed 2 service documents or to comply with the Court’s order. (ECF No. 39.) 3 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, filed August 24, 2018, requesting that the 4 Court reissue the March 9, 2018 order finding service of the first amended complaint appropriate. 5 (ECF No. 40.) Plaintiff states that she suffers from many physical and mental illnesses and 6 complications, which may sometimes interfere with her court filings. Plaintiff further states that 7 she may have either misplaced, lost, or never received the Court’s March 9, 2018 order. As she 8 cannot locate the Court’s order in any of her legal documents, Plaintiff requests reissuance of the 9 order and service documents for completion. (Id.) The Court assumes that Plaintiff also seeks an 10 extension of the deadline for submission of the service documents to the Court, which were due 11 on or before August 21, 2018. Generally, the Clerk’s Office will provide copies for Plaintiff at a cost of $0.50 per page. 12 13 Under the circumstances, the Court will make a one-time exception and will direct the Clerk’s 14 Office to provide a copy of the pending findings and recommendations to Plaintiff at no charge. 15 However, Plaintiff is advised that any further copies will need to be paid for by Plaintiff, and that 16 it is her responsibility to maintain copies of all orders received from the Court. 17 With respect to extending the deadline for submission of service documents, the Court 18 notes that, in her prior three motions seeking extensions or a stay of this action, Plaintiff has never 19 claimed that she was unable to locate a copy of the Court’s order or the service documents to be 20 completed. Rather, Plaintiff has argued that she did not have adequate access to the law library, 21 and that she suffers from various mental and physical ailments that limit her ability to litigate this 22 action. (See ECF Nos. 33, 36, 38.) 23 The Court has been awaiting completion of these service documents, a task that does not 24 require legal research to complete, for more than five months. As noted above, the deadline has 25 already been extended four times. Plaintiff will be provided with one final opportunity to file her 26 completed service documents. Future requests for extension of time regarding this deadline 27 will be subject to a narrow interpretation of what constitutes good cause. 28 /// 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for reissuance of the Court’s March 9, 2018 order, (ECF No. 40), is GRANTED; 2. The Clerk’s Office shall mail a copy of the March 9, 2018 order, (ECF No. 30), including all attachments and service documents for completion, to Plaintiff; 3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall submit 7 completed service documents for Defendants Mirelez and Hoehing, as discussed in the 8 Court’s March 9, 2018 order; and 9 10 4. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action for failure to obey court orders and failure to prosecute. 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara August 27, 2018 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?