Mario Amador Gonzalez v. Warden Soto et al

Filing 166

ORDER granting in part Defendants' 165 Motion to modify the scheduling order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 2/5/2019. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

MARIO AMADOR GONZALEZ,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

Case No. 1:16-cv-01675-DAD-EPG (PC)
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MODIFY
THE SCHEDULING ORDER

v.
DR. SCHARFFENBERG and R.N. S. SOTO,

(ECF NO. 165)

Defendants.

11
12
13

On February 5, 2019, Defendants filed a request for an extension of time to file their

14

pretrial statement. (ECF No. 103). As there is a pending motion for summary judgment,

15

Defendants ask that they be given two weeks from the date of the District Court’s order on the

16

motion for summary judgment to file their pretrial statement.

17

The Court finds good cause to grant Defendants’ motion in part. Defendants will be

18

given two weeks from the date this Court issues its findings and recommendations on the

19

motion for summary judgment to file their pretrial statement. The Court notes that, after the

20

findings and recommendations are issued, Defendants may request a further extension of time

21

with the benefit of those findings and recommendations.

22

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants have fourteen days from the date this

23

Court issues its findings and recommendations on the motion for summary judgment to file

24

their pretrial statement.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated:

February 5, 2019

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1