Gonzalez v. County of Merced et al
Filing
46
ORDER ADOPTING 43 Findings and Recommendations in Full, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/28/17. Amended Complaint due by 7/14/2017. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
ASHLEY GONZALEZ,
7
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
1:16-cv-1682-LJO-SAB
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL (Doc.
43)
v.
COUNTY OF MERCED and GREGORY M.
RICH,
Defendants.
11
12
The Court previously adopted in full the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that the Court
13
1
14 dismiss with leave to amend dismiss Plaintiff Ashley Gonazlez’s Monell claim against Defendant
15 County of Merced (“the County”). Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“the FAC”) in which she
16 again asserts a Monell claim against the County. The Magistrate Judge has again issued Findings and
17 Recommendations (“F&Rs”) in which he recommends granting the County’s motion to dismiss
18 Plaintiff’s Monell claim in the FAC, again with leave to amend. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the
19 F&Rs to which the County timely responded. Docs. 44, 45.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708
20
21 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record and finds that the
22 F&Rs are supported by proper analysis and the record. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that:
1. The F&Rs (Doc. 43) are ADOPTED IN FULL;
23
24
25
1
Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. of City of N.Y., 436 U.S. 658 (1978).
1
1
2. Plaintiff’s Monell claim is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND;
2
3. Plaintiff shall have one final opportunity to amend the complaint; and
3
4. Any amended complaint shall be filed by July 14, 2017.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
June 28, 2017
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?