Gonzalez v. County of Merced et al

Filing 65

ORDER Continuing Defendant County of Merced's Motion to Dismiss and the Review Hearing as to Defendant Rich to September 20, 2017 at 10:00 A.M., signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/1/17. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ASHLEY GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, 12 ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANT COUNTY OF MERCED’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND THE REVIEW HEARING AS TO DEFENDANT RICH TO SEPTEMBER 20, 2017, AT 10:00 A.M. v. 13 14 Case No. 1:16-cv-01682-LJO-SAB COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On July 28, 2017, Defendant County of Merced filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 51.) 18 On August 9, 2017, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation to continue the hearing on 19 Defendant County of Merced’s motion to dismiss to September 13, 2017. (ECF No. 57.) On 20 August 10, 2017, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation to continue the review hearing as to 21 Defendant Rich to September 13, 2017. (ECF No. 59.) On August 23, 2017, Plaintiff filed a 22 motion to lift the stay and permit discovery. (ECF No. 62.) 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 Accordingly, in the interest of judicial efficiency, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 1 2 hearing on Defendant County’s motion to dismiss and the review hearing as to Defendant Rich 3 are CONTINUED from September 13, 2017, to September 20, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. before the 4 undersigned in Courtroom 9. As Defendant Rich’s opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to lift the 5 stay should address the status of his criminal proceedings, Defendant Rich does not have to file a 6 separate status report prior to the September 20, 2017 hearing. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: September 1, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?