Gaines v. Virk et al

Filing 33

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motions to Extend Time to Respond to Order to Show Cause Nunc Pro Tunc and Discharging 28 Order to Show Cause; Clerk to Forward Service Documents to U.S. Marshal, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/5/19. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARY LEE GAINES, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. BEAVER, Defendant. 15 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE NUNC PRO TUNC AND DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; CLERK TO FORWARD SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO U.S. MARSHAL (Docs. 28-31) 16 17 Case No.: 1:16-cv-01689-LJO-JLT (PC) The Court ordered Plaintiff to submit service documents and USM-285 Forms for service 18 by the United States Marshal. (Doc. 25.) When Plaintiff did not comply, the Court ordered her to 19 show cause why the action should not be dismissed. (Doc. 28.) Plaintiff then filed three motions 20 seeking an extension of time to comply with the order to submit service documents and to 21 respond to the order to show cause. (Docs. 29-30.) Plaintiff also submitted the required 22 documents for service on Defendant. (Doc. 32.) Good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS: 23 24 Plaintiff’s motions for extensions of time to comply and/or respond to the Court’s orders, (Docs. 29-30), are granted nunc pro tunc and the order to show cause, (Doc. 28), is discharged. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: August 5, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?